My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/06/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/06/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:38:12 PM
Creation date
11/10/2011 9:06:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
10/06/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vice Chairperson Van Scoy asked if a title search was done on the property and if Mr. Reed <br /> received a copy of the conditional use permit at the time of closing. <br /> Mr. Reed stated he assumed it was done, as he purchased title insurance and he received a stack <br /> of papers but does not believe he received a copy of the conditional use permit. <br /> Commissioner Brauer asked if the house was for sale on Craigslist. <br /> Mr. Reed stated he is going in a different direction to clean up the neighborhood and is not <br /> selling the house at this time. <br /> Commissioner Field asked if the accessory dwelling was currently rented. <br /> Mr. Reed stated no, his uncle and aunt are currently living there. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Bauer, seconded by Commissioner Field, to close the public hearing. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chairperson Van Scoy, Commissioners Bauer, Field, and <br /> Brauer. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners Dunaway and Schiller. <br /> Chairperson Levine closed the public hearing at 8:37 p.m. <br /> Commission Business <br /> Discussion ensued regarding the use; is it lawful non - conforming, the CUP states it is not to be a <br /> rental property; however, it became a part of the rental licensing program, and how the history of <br /> rental of the accessory dwelling affects the amendment to the CUP. <br /> Commissioner Bauer stated that the best use of the existing structure regardless of how it came <br /> about or how it has been used. The best case for it to be well maintained is to allow it be used as <br /> a residential facility. <br /> Commissioner Field stated he likes that policy however, it appears to be rewarding not following <br /> what was previously approved. He likes the policy of allowing accessory dwellings as a potential <br /> rental. Today you see more and more relatives moving back in with relatives so there is more of <br /> a demand. <br /> Vice Chairperson Van Scoy stated he is frustrated with the fact that we have a CUP that was very <br /> specific and the City issued a rental license and created the problem. <br /> Senior Planner Gladhill asked if the Commissioners would like to have the City Attorney's <br /> opinion if the Commission is setting any precedence that a rental license was given and on the <br /> federal acts as well. <br /> Commissioner Brauer stated that he is not just frustrated but angry, the commission passed this <br /> with a very specific requirement and he would like to know what happened that would allow <br /> Planning Commission /October 6, 2011 <br /> Page 3of5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.