My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 11/15/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2011
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 11/15/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:18:42 AM
Creation date
11/10/2011 4:35:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
11/15/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Works Committee 5. 6. <br />Meeting Date: 11/15/2011 <br />By: Tim Himmer, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Discuss Potential Reconstruction of Garnet Street, North of 167th Avenue <br />Background: <br />Street maintenance activities on Garnet Street NW, between 167th Avenue and the BROOKFIELD subdivision, <br />have not occurred on the City's standard maintenance plan. Maintenance activities have been delayed in this area <br />for several reasons over the years; including the idea that adjacent development would expand to this area and thus <br />result in new street layouts and /or installation of utilities, poor subgrade, and discussions with the residents <br />regarding potential fixes and assessments. The road was constructed in 1988 and has only received one sealcoat <br />application, which occurred in 2006. It is one of the lowest rated street segments in the City and accounts for a <br />large portion of the City's patching budget. <br />Staff has met with the residents along this street on several occasions and they feel that the City has not properly <br />maintained this street and should therefore be responsible for the premature deterioration. They have also <br />complained about damage to the road that occurred during the construction activities for BROOKFIELD. They <br />have stated that they would not be supportive of the options outlined to date, due to cost considerations, and would <br />most likely counter - petition the improvement. They have asked that the road continue to be patched to a good <br />condition until such time that an improvement project can be initiated that would keep assessments in line with what <br />other neighborhoods are paying for a similar improvement. They were also interested in the status of the discussion <br />related to a potential franchise fee, as that may make the costs more palatable. Attached is a breakdown of the <br />potential improvements and their associated costs, as previously discussed with the Council at work session in <br />December of 2009. <br />Notification: <br />Observations: <br />While going through the long term street maintenance and reconstruction initiative, it has been discussed that we <br />could utilize the Public Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund as seed money for this program. Staff was considering <br />this segment of Garnet Street as a kick -off project to have as an example for what the program would provide. This <br />project was included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as a 2012 improvement, and staff is looking for <br />direction from the Council on whether this is an approach you would like to consider for next construction season. <br />Funding Source: <br />The funding source identified in the CIP for the Garnet Street reconstruction project is the PIR fund. There have <br />been recent discussions to utilize this fund for a one time transfer for the 2012 budget cycle, which would deplete <br />the balance to a point where this reconstruction improvement would not be feasible. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Committee Action: <br />Based upon discussion. <br />Summary of Improvements & Costs <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.