Laserfiche WebLink
Board Member Bauer introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION #11- 09 -153A <br />RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT #0890 RELATING TO A REQUEST <br />FROM ROB SCHILLER FOR A VARIANCE TO FRONT YARD SETBACK AT 8700 <br />171 AVE NW <br />WHEREAS, Rob Schiller, hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant," has properly <br />applied for a variance from Section 117 -111 (R -1 Residential District) of the Ramsey City Code <br />to construct an addition to an existing attached accessory building (the "Structure ") encroaching <br />on the front yard setback on the property generally known as 8700 171 Ave NW and legally <br />described as follows: <br />Lot 1, Block 4, Alicia Addition <br />(the "Subject Property"). <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE <br />CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1. That the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing pursuant <br />to Section 117 -53 of the Ramsey City Code on September 8, 2011 and that said public <br />hearing was properly advertised, and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby <br />incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. <br />2. That the Subject Property is approximately 2.02 acres in size and is located in the R -1 Rural <br />Developing zoning district. <br />3. That the Subject Property is surrounded by properties also zoned R -1 Rural Developing. <br />4. That the Subject Property has frontage along 171 Avenue and Rabbit Street. <br />5. That the Applicant is proposing to construct a four (4) foot extension to the existing <br />attached accessory building (the "Structure ") on the Subject Property, which will create the <br />effect of having a four (4) foot encroachment into the front yard setback. <br />6. That the minimum front and side yard setback for properties within the R -1 Rural <br />Developing District are forty (40) feet and ten (10) feet, respectively. <br />7. That the Variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. <br />8. That the Variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />9. That the Applicant proposes to use the Subject Property that is not in a reasonable manner <br />not permitted by the ordinance. <br />