My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/01/2011 - Work Session
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/01/2011 - Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:09:33 AM
Creation date
11/23/2011 4:31:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Work Session
Document Date
12/01/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
534
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11A Metropolitan Council <br />AA <br />2000-30 Target: <br />Developed Area: <br />Developing Area: <br />Rural Growth Centers: <br />Remaining Rural Area: <br />2000-10 Actual: <br />Developed Area: <br />Developing Area: <br />Rural Growth Centers: <br />Remaining Rural Area: <br />The Great Recession deflated <br />employment growth in <br />communities across various <br />development stages, from the <br />central cities to suburbs and <br />rural areas. Both of the last <br />decade's recessions hit the <br />region's developed core hardest. <br />The developed areas—i.e., <br />Minneapolis, St. Paul, and <br />surrounding fully developed <br />suburbs —suffered considerable <br />job losses during the 2001 <br />recession, and never regained <br />2000-level employment before <br />the Great Recession hit in 2007. <br />With an annual average loss of over 10,300 total jobs, the developed area lags far behind its <br />benchmark growth rate of 9,600 jobs per year. While the developing area as a whole <br />experienced continuous job growth from 2000 to 2008, its employment began to fall in 2006. <br />The developed communities are currently at 50 percent of their annual benchmark job growth <br />rate of 7,200 jobs per year. Rural area employment levels advanced more moderately from <br />2000 to 2008, and suffered more modest job losses between 2008 and 2010. The annual <br />average growth in rural areas is more in line with the growth forecasted for these areas. <br />Regional Benchmarks <br />Measuring Our Progress <br />2011 Update <br />286,561 jobs (55 percent or 9,600 jobs per year) <br />215,712 jobs (41 percent or 7,200 jobs per year) <br />7,443 jobs (1 percent or 250 jobs per year) <br />11,579 jobs (2 percent or 390 jobs per year) <br />-102, 815 jobs (-10,282 jobs per year) <br />36,078 jobs (3,608 jobs per year) <br />-69 jobs (-7 jobs per year) <br />1,876 jobs (188 jobs per year) <br />Regional Distribution of Employment Growth, <br />2000-2010 <br />9,600 <br />250 390 188 <br />Developed <br />Ar� <br />(10,282) <br />7,200 <br />3,608 <br />Developing <br />Area <br />Rural CeQrs Remaining <br />Rural <br />Target Average Annual Change Actual Average Annual Change <br />Note: While the Metropolitan Council adjusted the designations of eight communities from Developing to Developed <br />with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates, this analysis used the prior categorization to maintain continuity. <br />Source: Metropolitan Council Research analysis of Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, Minnesota <br />Department of Employment and Economic Development. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.