Laserfiche WebLink
EAW SUNWO0D DRIVE <br />RAMSEY, MINN~ESOTA <br />RESPONSE TO .COMMENTS <br /> <br />The comment period for the above referenced EAW expired May 26, 1994. <br />Comments were received from one nearby landowner, from Metropolitan Council <br />(MC), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the Minnesota Historical <br />Society (MHS).. The letters of comment from all but the MHS are attached. The <br />Minnesota HistOrical Society indicated that an archaeological review should be done <br />within the corridor. The City contracted with a consultant to provide these services. <br />A written repor~ is due in the near future, but the verbal report is that no significant <br />historical or arcl~aeologicalresources were located in the corridor. The responses to <br />comments are as follows: <br /> <br />COMMENTS FR~M MR. BEN DEEMER (MAY 5, 1994) <br />RAMSEY, MINNESOTA <br /> <br />.P. 2, Item 16 S, teeD slopes/erodible soils. <br /> <br />The slopes south of Sunfish Lake vary from approximately a 9% slope on the <br />west to :approximately 16% at the steepest portion. With the proposed <br />alignment a portion of the hillside would be cleared and appropriate grades <br />would be cut. Cut materials will be used to balance fill requirements elsewhere <br />within the project. A segment of this roadway may require retaining walls for <br />a distance of 400' more or less. As design phases proceed, the extent of wall <br />verses gr!ading will become clearer. In any event, the proposed construction <br />will include slope stabilization through grading, retaining wall(s) as appropriate, <br />and revegation. An unfortunate result of the WCA but common occurrence <br />with projects is that woodlands are being sacrificed in order to avoid or <br />minimize wetland impacts, regardless of the functional value of the particular <br />wetland. <br /> <br />P. 3, Item 18 - OHW <br /> <br />The City,ordinance requires that the same OHW setback apply to streets and <br />pavemen~ts as with structures whenever possible. The ordinance however, <br />does allow some latitude. In addition, the OHW level is not the same as the <br />wetland edge. Typically the wetland will be larger than the boundary of the <br />OHW. In this case, as with others, the intent is to avoid or minimize impacts <br />on wetlal~ds to the extent practicable. '.,. <br /> <br /> <br />