Laserfiche WebLink
THE ZONING REPORT <br />For Planning and Zonin~ Professionals <br /> <br /> ISSN 0748-0083 <br />VOL 12, NO 1 ~- JAN 7, 1994 -- Charles Reed, AICP, Editor/Publisher -- $58/year/subscription <br /> <br />HOW TO SET UP R]DGULATIONS FOR KFARING EXAMINE}~ <br /> <br />(Part One of two parts) <br /> <br />There's eot to be a better way to hold zoning <br />public hearings and decide cases, hlany com- <br />munities believe they may have found a better <br />way. They replace their BZA or CPC and <br /> <br />elected board with a hearing examiner to hear <br /> <br />and decide variances and rezonings. <br /> We take two issues to discuss this topic. This <br /> <br />issue~ Part One, provides our rules, ideas, sug- <br />gestions and caveats for setting up hearing <br />examiner provisions in zoning codes, along with <br />eleven suggested code sections. Part Two, <br />which you receive in two weeks on January <br />21s%, quotes selected zoning code provisions <br />that illustrate our commentary from Part One. <br /> <br />increasing number of special uses, site plan <br />reviews, special zones, planned zones and ex- <br />ceptional uses. All of these require the filing <br />of applications that lengthen agendas. Still yet <br />only one citizen board remains at each level to <br />hear these applications as cases. <br /> Thirdly, court case law is beginning to re- <br />quire zoning public hearings be conducted in a <br />quasi-judicial framework rather than in the <br />traditional informal legislative setting. In the <br />quasi-judicial framework, hearings are conduct- <br />ed in a highly structured format that emulates <br />the procedure used in court trials. Each case <br />must have written findings, with conclusions <br />that support its decision. <br /> <br /> ..... Fourth; state legislatures are mandating that <br />Communities switch to hearing examiners' ....... ~'.~'"'; lo~alitie'~ prepare a comprehensive plan and are <br />for these five reasons ~,otrequiring that zoning case decisions conform to <br /> '.--~\!~ L ~' ~t. This reomrement sh~ts the tactics for win- <br />For the first reason, one or more of 'the c!tj-,~-,~ning zoning cases from emotional appeals and <br />zen boards that hear and decide zoningl cas~s' ~-packing the auditorium with sign-waving advo- <br /> <br />burn out and become disillusioned at-whether <br />they are obtaining benefits for whatever pur- <br />poses--political, community-building or a sense <br />of civic duty. Members of the BZA, CPC and <br />elected board come to the realization that <br />there is no end to the all-day acrimony one to <br />four times a month, in 8-12 hour meetings, <br />with irate citizens and unhappy participants <br />leaning on board members day and night. <br /> Secondly, zoning agendas get longer as the <br />case load grows because the trend of zoning <br />code text changes is to create more situations <br />that require public hearings. These include an <br /> <br />cares to a strategy linked to the comprehen- <br />sive plan. <br /> If the comprehensive plan must be amended <br />before the zoning is heard so that the rezoning <br />and the plan are consistent, the hearing exam- <br />iner holds hearings and decides rezonings and <br />the CPC considers and adopts amendments to <br />the comprehensive plan. The linkage between <br />the rezoning and plan change both previously <br />heard by the CPC is now separately decided by <br />two bodies independent of each other, <br /> Fifth. communities expect the hearing exam- <br />iner process to reduce %he number of appeals <br /> <br />¢' 1994 by Charles Reed ........ <br /> <br />1404 N. State Road 7, Suite 269; Margate, Florida 33063 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-- Mailing address: PO Box 6529; Margate, Florida 33063 <br /> <br /> <br />