My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
02/01/94
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
02/01/94
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 9:28:11 AM
Creation date
10/20/2003 10:49:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
02/01/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page Five <br /> <br />THE ZONIN<3 REPORT <br /> <br />ficial or body--the elected board, the city <br />manager or county executive, the mayor as <br />chief executive, or the elected commissioner <br />with authority over the community's planning- <br />zoning function. The appointment is for a fixed <br />term of office or at the pleasure of the ap- <br />pointing authority. <br /> Qualification for the position is listed in the <br />zoning code as appropriate training, experience <br />and ability to conduct fair and proper hearings. <br />The qualifications do not include the need to <br />be a lav,,yer or a professional planner, ba~vyers <br /> <br />with considerable planning practice or training <br />or planners with considerable exposure to legal <br />functions or strong training and experience in <br />current planning can serve quite well. <br /> Deputy hearing examiners should be authoriz- <br /> <br />ed. They can serve in the absence of the hear- <br />ing examiner excused from a case due to con- <br />~ict of interest, illness or vacation. Since the <br />zoning code requires zoning cases to be dock- <br />eted on agendas to' be heard within a maximum <br />time period, excessively long agendas might <br />occur. The cases on long agendas can be divid- <br />ed between the examiner and a deputy examin- <br />er to provide each examiner adequate time to <br />review and hear each case. Large jurisdictions <br />might have a sufficiently large and steady vo}- <br />ume of cases that more than one hearing exam- <br />iner is needed permanently to hear cases year- <br />round. <br /> The code designates how cases are assigned <br />to examiners. If the planning-zoning office <br />administers the examiner's clerical functions, <br />the zoning code should assure that the examin- <br />er assigns cases to agenda dockets, not the <br />planning-zoning office. But cases can be as- <br />signed tentatively by staff subject to accep- <br />tance by the hearing examiner. <br /> <br />Section 3. Duties and jurisdiction of the hear- <br /> <br />ina examiner.-- This section describes the type <br />of development applications heard by the ex- <br />aminer, such as variances, rezonings, special <br />uses, conditional uses, PUDs, plats and various <br />types of appeals of administrative decisions by <br />the zoning administrator and building official <br />on building permits and zoning clearances. <br /> <br /> The examiner is authorized to attach reason- <br />able conditions to any decision in a case just <br />as the CPC and BZA had done. These condi- <br />tions include the recommendations of the staff <br />plats committee and the results of negotiation <br />with the applicant, staff and objectors based <br />on testimony and evidence presented in the <br />hearing. <br /> For sites proposed for development, the ex- <br />aminer must follo~' standards and guidelines set <br />forth in the zoning code for variances, special <br />uses and conditional uses. Conditions car, in- <br />clude shifts of land use and densities on the <br />site, and the phasing of development; addition, <br />deletion or shifts in site elements, the layout <br />of lots, blocks, building complexes and circula- <br />tion patterns that otherwise would create ad- <br />verse impacts; the package of 6-12 or so points <br />relating to infrastructure and procedure recom- <br />mended by staff many times in their review of <br />subdivisions and site plans; agreements with <br />abutting property owners and public agencies <br />for sharing the financing and installation of <br />infrastructure and its capacity and design af- <br />fecting more the the applicant's property, sub- <br />ject to any necessary approvals by the elected <br />board; maintenance permanently required by <br />the applicant after the site is developed; and <br />site changes due to environmental and public <br />health standards related to zoning such as hill- <br />side and wetland development set forth in the <br />zoning code or as recommended by environ- <br />mental and health agencies. <br /> For preliminary plats~ the examiner can re- <br />quire ROW :for proposed streets to be dedicat- <br />ed or be private, subject to the standards of <br />development codes and the rules of the public <br />engineer and can accept the method of instal- <br />lation of infrastructure or performance bond as <br />authorized by the subdivision code. For final <br />plats, the examiner can accept dedication of <br />ROW and.various types of easements if he is <br />authorized to accept final plats. <br /> For each'type of application, the code speci- <br />fies whether the examiner decides it or recom- <br />mends a decision on it to another body that <br />decides it. The zoning code allows the examin- <br />er to pass on a case for any reason. A deputy <br /> <br />January 7, 1994 Issue <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.