My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
02/01/94
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
02/01/94
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 9:28:11 AM
Creation date
10/20/2003 10:49:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
02/01/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page Three <br /> <br />THE ZONING REPORT <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> tion with the particular case unless made a <br /> part of the record in the case, and <br /> "C. The Hearing Officer shall not inspect the <br /> site with any party or his representative unless <br /> all parties are given an oplDortunity to be pres- <br /> ent. <br /> "Sec. 113: Evidence: With respect to deter- <br /> mining findings o! iact and conclusions of law, <br /> the Hearing Officer ma}' receive ora] testimony <br /> and demonstrative or written evidence, as long <br /> as the evidence has any tendency to make the <br /> e×isteno~ of any fact that is of consequence to <br /> the determination of the matter before her <br /> more probable or less probable than it would <br /> be without the evidence. Hearsay shaI] be ad- <br /> .m.issible except that the Hearing Officer may <br /> take into account that such evidence is hear- <br />.say with respect to the weight given to it. In <br /> any event, the Hearing Officer may not admit <br /> any evidence which a reasonable and prudent <br /> person would not rely upon in the conduct of <br /> their everyday affairs. <br /> "Sec. 114: Appeals from Hearing Officer De- <br /> <br />cisions: <br />"A. The applicant or any other par~y in inter- <br />est may appeal a decision of the Hearing Offi- <br />cer, provided such party files with the Cily <br />Clerk/Treasurer a written notice of appeal <br />~"ithin i0 days after the date of the decision <br />by the Hearing Officer. The notice of appeal <br />shall state the grounds of appeal. <br />"5. In the event a perfected appeal is filed <br />with respect to an5, matter under the jurisdic- <br />tion of the Hearing Officer, the matter appeal- <br />ed shall be forwarded to the City Council, <br />along with all of the evidence admitted by the <br />Hearing Officer, and the transcript of the pro- <br />ceedings before the Hearing Officer with res- <br />pect to that particular matter. The appeal <br />sh~ll be heard at the next regular City Council <br /> <br />meeting occurring at least 10 days after the <br />certification of the record by the Director of <br />Pianning to the City Council. <br /> <br /> "If there is substanti~ evidence in the rec- <br />ord to support the decision of the Hearing Of- <br />ficer, then Council shall affirm such decision <br />of the Hearing Officer. If there is not substan- <br /> <br />tia] evidence in the record to support the deci- <br />sion of the Hearing Officer, then the Council <br />may reverse the decision of the Hearing Offi- <br />cer, or remand the matter back to the Hearing <br />Officer for further proceedings. No new evi- <br />dence shah be submitted to the Council unless <br /> <br />a majority of the Council determines that such <br />evidence could not have been reasonably pre- <br />sented at the time the matter was heard be- <br />fore the Hearing Officer. If the Council de- <br />cides to hear such new evidence, it may hear <br />the new evidenc~ or remand the matter back <br />to the Hearing Officer for further proceedings. <br />Notwithstanding any requirements in the sub- <br />section B. to the contrary, the City Council <br />shall have the discretion to modify, reject, or <br />add to the conditions of record established by <br />the Hearing Officer with respect to any matter <br />before it on appeal. A verbatim record of the <br />proceedings before the City Council shah be <br />made by electronic recording device or other <br />appropriate method. <br />"D. On such appeals, the decision of the City <br />Council shall be final agency action, and shah <br />be subject to review by the courts pursuant to <br />applicable rules and statutes, unless the matter <br />is remanded to the Hearing Officer. <br />"E. A perfected appeal shall operate as a stay <br />of the Hearing Officer's decision unless the <br />Hearing Officer certifies in writing that a stay <br />would cause or result in an imminent hazard %o <br />the public health, safety and welfare .... <br />"F. in the event that the decision of the Hear- <br />ing Officer is not appealed to the City Council <br />within 10 days from the date of the decision, <br />than said decision shah constitute final agency <br /> <br />action for all purposes under the applicable <br />state statutes and rules and reg.ulations. The <br />failure to appeal the decision of the Hearing <br />Officer within the 10 day period shall be <br />deemed to be a waiver of the applicants or a <br />party in interest~s, as the case may be, right <br />to appeal to the courts under Rule 106 of the <br />Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure' for failure <br />to.exhaust administrative remedies. <br />"G. The filing fee and cost of preparing the <br /> <br />transcript of proceedings before the Hearing <br />Officer on appeal to the City Council shall be <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />January 21, 1994 Issue <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.