Laserfiche WebLink
City Engineer Himmer reviewed the staff report and asked whether Garnet Street, between 167th <br />Avenue and the Brookfield subdivision, should be used as a kick-off project using the Public <br />Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund as seed money. <br />Councilmember Backous stated he would say the same thing if facing a road assessment, for the <br />City to continue to maintain the roads until a franchise fee is in place to make cost more <br />palatable. <br />City Engineer Himmer explained the City can consider deferred assessments for lots with <br />enough foot frontage that the lot can be subdivided. In that case, the lot with the principal <br />structure can be charged a typical assessment and the rest deferred until development occurs. In <br />that case, the remaining assessment would be paid at the time the lots are sold. <br />Chairperson McGlone asked whether this area has large acre lots. <br />City Engineer Himmer answered in the affirmative. <br />Public Works Director Olson commented on projects that also include utilities and curb and <br />gutter. He asked whether the Public Works Committee thinks this is an important enough project <br />to put forward. If so, staff will design the project over the winter months for construction next <br />year. <br />Councilmember Elvig noted when the property to the north was done, it was assumed the <br />property to the south would likely sell out and give initiative to put in roads and utilities. At that <br />time, Mr. Peterson had talked with property owners and got 10 out of 12 in agreement. <br />However, now they want the road only patched and it is the worse road in Ramsey. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated he does not see a way that development will come to initiate this <br />project for many years so something needs to be done to replace that road. He asked whether the <br />City should put in a new road as cost effective as possible knowing that some day utilities will go <br />in. Or, should the City reconstruct the road with utility infrastructure, paying for the utilities <br />from the Utility Fund, and charging property owners for a normal assessment. <br />Public Works Director Olson stated the City could move forward with a plan that included water <br />and sewer in the roadway, providing future hookups and services to the property line paid by the <br />Enterprise Funds, and getting reimbursed when people connect. <br />Chairperson McGlone asked whether property owners would not have to bear part of the cost. <br />Public Works Director Olson stated if the property is assessed 100%, owners will counter <br />petition. He noted the storm sewer improvement would not be assessed but the sanitary sewer <br />and water could be deferred with payment upon connection. <br />City Engineer Himmer stated the City did the same thing on 167th Avenue where utilities were <br />installed and lateral charges paid upon connection. <br />Public Works Committee / November 15, 2011 <br />Page 10 of 15 <br />