Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Committee 5. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 12/13/2011 <br />By: Tim Himmer, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Consider Requirements for Information That Must be Included on Certificates of Survey. <br />Background: <br />From time to time, the City has found itself in costly difficulties caused by the improper placement of buildings and <br />structures. Currently, the City requires only a Certificate of Survey for a property prior to issuance of a building <br />permit. This Certificate of Survey shows how the structure is intended to be built on the lot, but there is no <br />guarantee that the builder ends up constructing it according to that survey. City staff has always had a list of criteria <br />for inclusion on a Certificate of Survey, but I don't believe it has ever been formalized by the City Council. Staff <br />would like to introduce the attached Certificate of Survey requirements for Council consideration, which <br />proposes the level of detail that must be included on all Certificates of Survey submitted for a building permit. <br />The outcome of the required information on the Certificate of Survey is intended to accomplish the following: <br />1. The required setback information may reduce the need for variances due to improper placement of structures. <br />2. Having all the relevant information in one location would streamline the review process and establish a <br />"starting point" for all future use of the property; making it easier to review future expansions, assessor <br />structure requests, etc. <br />3. The probability of installing a structure at an incorrect elevation would be eliminated, thereby lessening <br />future drainage and flooding concerns. <br />4. Inclusion of all easements would eliminate the possibility of a structure being placed within a City or private <br />easement. <br />5. Floodway and setbacks from the Rum River and Mississippi River are constantly a point of concern and are <br />at times difficult to ascertain because of incomplete or insufficient amounts of information. These problems <br />would be eliminated. <br />6. The City of Ramsey has a significant portion of lands that are designated as floodplain, floodway, or <br />floodway fringe. These areas, for flood insurance purposes, require a response from the City as to the <br />applicability of such insurances. Short of the City surveying the property at no cost to the applicant we are in <br />a dubious position of either not designating a structure in a floodway (and potentially being liable therefore), <br />or designating it in a floodway and potentially costing the homeowner unnecessary insurance. This should be <br />the builder/property owner's responsibility to provide this information, and to establish an accurate location of <br />the structure(s) in relation to these critical elevations. <br />By not requiring this information of the applicant, City staff must spend significant amounts of time compiling all <br />these items from various sources in an attempt to pull them all together for any land use applications and/or <br />permits. All this ultimately leads to additional resources (and costs) for investigations and potential future <br />corrective actions, while providing no stability and level of integrity of construction projects which could be a <br />liability to prospective new owners. <br />Staff does understands that these requirements for the Certificate of Survey may lead to more up -front costs for the <br />builder/property owner (estimated between $250 - $500), and that it may be difficult to enact during this difficult <br />economic time. We believe, however, that it will lead to an enhanced understanding and relationship between <br />builders so they are able to work seamlessly alongside each other within a development. It will also ensure that the <br />public will be served now and in the future with reduced costs due to reduced conflicts, and additional staff time <br />being used to correct problems that may be encountered due to poor site grading in the beginning. The additional <br />requirements are considered a cost of doing business, are appropriate, and are in line with other communities in the <br />metro area are currently doing. <br />