My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/13/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2011
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/13/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:22:58 PM
Creation date
12/13/2011 2:46:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
12/13/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Work Session 2. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 12/13/2011 <br />By: Patrick Brama, Administrative Services <br />Title: <br />Development Costs Study Follow Up <br />Background: <br />As part of the 2011 City Council Strategic goals, evaluating the City of Ramsey's development/building fees was <br />identified as a high priority. City staff undertook a development costs study in the spring. Results of the <br />Development Costs Study were presented to the City Council in August. Questions and inquires from the August <br />presentation were investigated by city staff and responded to in November. On December 8th the City hosted a <br />developer/builder open house. The purpose of this case is to address inquires from the November meeting and to <br />report the results of the builder /developer open house. <br />Notification: <br />None required at this time. <br />Observations: <br />Builder /Developer Open House: <br />The builder /developer open house took place on Thursday December 8th. About 200 builders and developers, along <br />with five organizations, were invited. As part of the builder /developer open house staff organized an on -line <br />survey; with the purpose of gathering documented input and adding convenience for participants. The <br />on -line survey was available for participants to complete both from home /office and at the builder /developer open <br />house. Attached to this case is a summary of the input received both at the open house and from the survey. <br />Proposed Changes: <br />In addition to the proposed changes that were presented in the November meeting, staff received direction to adjust <br />fees that are based on the 2004 comprehensive sewer /water studies. Council direction was to reduce sewer/ <br />water rates by 3.7% to reflect 2010 rates until results from the new comprehensive sewer/ water study are available. <br />Per Unit Breakdown: <br />In the November meeting, staff received requests to breakdown the proposed changes to development costs to a per <br />unit basis rather than a development wide basis. Attached to this case is a per unit breakdown of the proposed <br />changes, in development fees, from 2011 to 2012. <br />Building Permit Fees Methodology: <br />Staff received inquires regarding the methodology of how building permit fees are calculated; and, what are the <br />actual costs to the city for work done regarding a building permit. NOTE: there are two building permit fees; base <br />building permit fee and the plan review fee. <br />Base Building Permit Fee: The City of Ramsey formulates their base building permit fee with two numbers; <br />valuation and the suggested UBC fee (table). "Valuation" is determined by establishing a per square foot <br />value of newly constructed home and then multiplying by the total number of square feet in that home. The <br />City of Ramsey uses per foot valuations developed by the State of Minnesota; which are updated annually. <br />In regards to the Universal Building Code (UBC) table, cities within the metro nearly exclusively use the <br />UBC table. Unfortunately, the UBC no longer exists. Therefore, nearly all cities in the metro are using the <br />1997 UBC table to formulate their building permit calculations. Some cities have tweaked the table to fit <br />their needs; however, they still use the 1997 UBC table. The reason the table is still viable today is <br />because valuation changes over the years, which allows the building permit fee to adjust to the market. <br />Finally, another reason the 1997 table is still exclusively used is the result of law suits that took place in the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.