My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/13/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2011
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/13/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:22:58 PM
Creation date
12/13/2011 2:46:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
12/13/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Work Session 2.2. <br />Meeting Date: 12/13/2011 <br />By: Tim Himmer, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Update on the Armstrong Boulevard Interchange <br />Background: <br />City and County staff, and our consultant (WSB), are preparing to submit the draft Environmental Assessment <br />(EA) for the Armstrong interchange project to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for review and <br />comment. Once the FHWA review is complete, the EA will then be going out for public comment in <br />approximately March or April of 2012. Staff wanted to update the Council on the project, and provide you with an <br />opportunity to review the draft EA at this time so we have the ability to potentially address any concerns that may <br />be brought forward before it enters the public comment period. Due to the size of the document and all the <br />attachments /exhibits, we could not attach it to this case but have rather placed a copy on the City's ftp site for your <br />review. Please take the opportunity to review the EA over the next few weeks and forward any comments and /or <br />concerns you may have to the engineering department. <br />Observations: <br />Staff would like to draw your attention to a couple of items within the preliminary interchange design that conflict <br />with the layout that is being advanced in the feasibility study that is currently underway for the Sunwood Drive <br />realignment project. <br />1. The location of 147th Avenue NW is currently shown in its existing location on the interchange design, but it <br />is shifted slightly south of its current location in the Sunwood realignment project. This was done to improve <br />the primary access into the COR from Armstrong Boulevard, and be consistent with the HRA approved <br />development plan. As a side note, the signal proposed at this intersection will be owned and maintained by <br />the City in perpetuity. <br />2. Armstrong Boulevard is shown to diverge to the east slightly out of the existing right -of -way into the COR <br />property on the interchange design, but remains in its current alignment on the Sunwood project. The <br />interchange project has been designed to avoid total takings of the properties along the west side of <br />Armstrong, and therefore the roadway is proposed to move slightly east onto vacant HRA land in an effort to <br />keep acquisition costs down. The Sunwood project proposes holding the existing Armstrong alignment to <br />remain consistent with the recent HRA direction to investigate purchasing properties on the west side of <br />Armstrong in an attempt to solve right -of -way acquisition issues for both projects. If we are able to <br />successfully acquire these parcels Armstrong would be able to remain in its current alignment, thereby <br />resulting in improved roadway geometrics and reduced interchange costs. <br />3 Staff was recently approached by Coborn's requesting a right -in condition be included in the interchange <br />project to better access their site. Attached to this case is an exhibit prepared by their consultant that shows <br />their desired access location on Armstrong Boulevard. Their proposal still needs to be discussed with <br />MnDOT and Anoka County to determine its feasibility, but the City will also have to provide input as to <br />whether it should be included in the future, and if so who would pay for it. <br />As opposed to re- designing the interchange project (and all associated approvals and documents that go with it) at <br />this late date, staff decided to continue with the plans as designed and referenced in all public meetings to date. If <br />the Sunwood realignment project moves forward revisions to the interchange design can be accommodated prior to <br />final design. The revisions being contemplated would only reduce the total project costs of the interchange, as we <br />would be preconstructing improvements that would have been attributed to the interchage, and would not adversely <br />affect the interchange project. <br />Recommendation: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.