07/05/94 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

property ~described in paragraph 1 of this description; thence northerly along the easterly line of ~ajd property forty (40) feet; thence southeasterly and parallel w~th said Highway 1~) to the eas~t~; eriy line of said Lot Three (3): thence souther}y on said easterly line to the point of beginaing. NiOW TItEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TL~E CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: 10. ]2. That the Applicant appeared before the Planning and Zoning Commission for a p~blic hearing pursuant to Section 9.03.04 of the Ramsey City Code on July 5, 1~94 and that said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of s~id public hearing are hereby incorporated by reference. That the subject property is located in the B-3 Highway Business District and is alSproximately 4 acres in size. T~hat the Applicant is proposing to place a 12' x 54' (648 square foot) portable office structure on the subject property. That the Applicant has stated that the purpose of the temporary structure is to pr~vide office space on the subject property until the fire damage to the pnncipal b~ilding that occurred on June 14, 1994 is repaired. That utilization of ternpora.D.., structures is not a permitted use in any zone in the CiD, of Ramsey without a special permit. That the Applicant has stated that the tempora_%, structure will ~ kept on the subject p(Operty for approximately 6 months to al. iow sufficient time to reconstruct the pr'j.ncipal building. That the properties to the south~ west and east are also zoned B-3 Highway; the prpperry on the north side of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks is zoned B0siness Warehous. That the pror>osed temporaD' structure has already been located on the sire and the Albplicant ha's deposited a $500.00 financial guarantee with the CiB' to ensure timely removal of the structure in the event the permit application is denied or upon the e~P/.ra6on date of the permit. That the proposed temporary structure will not increase traffic to or from the subject prCperty because it is not an enlargement of the faciliry but rather a tempora.ry replacement of existing office space lost in the f'~re. That the proposed temporary structure will/will not be unduly dangerous or d~'mmental to persons residing or working in the area. Ttia~ the proposed temporary su-ucture will/will not impair the use of surrounding properties. That the proposed temporary structure w/II/will not be maintained so as to be appropriate in appearance with the character of the general area.