My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
08/02/94
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
08/02/94
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 9:30:18 AM
Creation date
10/20/2003 2:54:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
08/02/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE <br /> <br /> REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF <br /> CHESTNUT RIDGE 2ND ADDITION; CASE OF GOOD VALUE HOMES <br /> r By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br />Background: <br /> <br />Good Value HoOaes is requesting preliminary plat approval of Chestnut Ridge 2nd Ad,dition. The <br />plat consists of ~5 acres proposed to be developed with municipal water and sanitar) sewer and <br />subdivided into ? 1 single family lots. The following items are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br />a) <br />b) <br />c) <br /> <br />Site location map <br />goposed preliminary plat <br /> ty Staff review letter dated July 27, 1994 <br /> <br />Observations:: <br /> <br />The property i~i zoned R-1 Residential, however, the northern half of the plat is not in the <br />Municipal Urba~ Service Area (MUSA)., It is anticipated that this portion of the plat will be in the <br />MUSA by this ~all with Metro Council s approval of the comprehensive plan amendment for a <br />MUSA expansic~n. <br /> <br />The plat will talC¢ some minor rework to assure that all lots meet the 10,800 square foot minimum <br />area and 80 foot~ot width requirements. <br /> <br />Sunwood Drive, is proposed to be extended west through the plat and no lots will have direct <br />access onto thisiMSA road. The developer has proposed two 'eyebrows' on Sunwood Drive to <br />create access to~ 7 of the lots. It is Staff's opinion that these two offset 'eyebrows' are not a <br />favorable design. It would also appear that there is more development potential south of Sunwood <br />Drive than the developer has proposed. Staff is recommending that the developer explore the <br />possibility of redesigning the 'eyebrow' on the south side of'Sunwood Drive into a through street <br />to connect with ~e north/south streets in the western portion of the plat. <br /> <br />The developer i~, proposing to install the public improvement as a private project with no financial <br />participation on the parr of the City. <br /> <br />The plat will be reviewed by the Park Commission on August 11. <br /> ; <br />Recommendat}on: <br /> <br />City Staff recommends preliminary plat approval contingent upon compliance with City Staff <br />Review letter dated July 27, 1994. <br /> <br /> Commi{sion Action: <br /> <br /> Motion tq: <br /> Recomrr~ nd that City Council grant preliminary plat approval to Chestnut Ridge 2nd <br /> Addition Iconringent upon the developer compliance with City Staff review letter dated July <br /> 27, 1994r.. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br /> <br />PC: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />City En~neer <br />Parks &- Utilities Supervisor <br />8/2/94 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.