My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 10/13/1994
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1994
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 10/13/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 12:24:21 PM
Creation date
10/21/2003 8:58:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
10/13/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DA'IF_,: <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />October 4, 1994 <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission <br /> <br />Mark Boos, Parks/Utilities Supervisor <br />Heidi Welsch, Community Development Intern <br /> <br />Fox Park Survey//2 <br /> <br />The results of the Fox Park Survey #2 seem clearly in favor of some type of development with 27 <br />surveys responding "YES" to park development and 9 responding "NO. This evidence seems to <br />substantiate the previous sur,,,e)"s favorable response. <br /> <br />The preferred landscaping scheme seems to be partial prairie restoration and partial mowed lawn. <br />Some conclusions can also be drawn about park development types - of people favoring some type <br />of park development, an overwhelming majority wishes to see play equipment, garbage cans, and <br />picnic tables put in the area. A strong majority wishes to see the boardwalk, handicap access, and <br />basketball court. <br /> <br />Conversely, a strong majority wishes not to see a parking lot, picnic shelter, picnic grills, or park <br />sign. A few items were more evenly split - volleyball court & tennis court. It can be reasonably <br />assumed that a majority of residents wish for some type of path, though the type (bituminous or <br />mowed) is questionable. <br /> <br />The previous surveys' responses should be kept in mind when making any final decision of Fox <br />Park. <br /> <br />tf we exclude the seven survey responses which wished for no development and checked "NO" to <br />ever5, suggestion, the results took like this: <br /> <br />Nothing 0 15 <br />Play Equipment 26 1 <br />Garbage Cans 22 3 <br />Picnic Tables 22 5 <br />Boardwalk 19 9 <br />Mowed Path 16 9 <br />Handicap Access 15 5 <br />Basketball 15 7 <br />Bituminous Path 15 10 <br />Volleyball 13 12 <br />Tennis 12 13 <br />Picnic Grills 9 17 <br />Park Sign 9 17 <br />Picnic Shelter 8 17 <br />Paring Lot 6 ' 20 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.