My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
09/14/94
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Fire Board
>
Agendas
>
1994
>
09/14/94
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2025 4:09:45 PM
Creation date
10/21/2003 9:08:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Fire Board
Document Date
09/14/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The selection/hinn[ process and ter- <br />.mination~ if not dope properb,,,~ may <br />.trap a city in a cosOv legal sinkhole. <br />The increasinq volume of coum dual- <br /> <br />lenges regarding employee selection <br />and termination has placed a much <br />.,treater responsibility on city govern- <br /> <br />ment to adorn a formalized emu, low <br /> <br />ment system. <br /> The system should insure nondiscri- <br />minatorT treatment of an individual at <br />all stages of employment, including <br />application, selection/rejection, employ- <br />ment, and termination. <br /> Cities va.D, in the procedures the}, <br />use for the selection and appointment <br />of city employees which is substantia3y <br />based on the form of government; there <br />is a city chm-ter and whether a city has <br />a merit or civil service system in place <br />for employees of a particular <br />department. <br /> This ardde offers a broad overview <br />that ma}, assist cities in review of their <br />selection and termination practices. <br />Employment law is rapidly developing <br />in all areas. Cities need to review on a <br />regular basis all state and federal legis- <br />lation pertaining to employee/employer <br />relationships. Address specific questions <br />to the city attorney or the League of <br />Minnesota Cities. <br /> <br />discrimination in employment. A thor- <br />ough review of the lan', both federal <br />and state, will guide and assist the city <br />at each phase of an employer/employee <br />relationship. <br />State and federal laws specifically <br />prohibit an employment system that <br /> <br />"The selection&k/ag <br />process and termination, ff <br />not done properly, may <br />trap a city in a costly legal <br />sink hole." <br /> <br />The initial stage--check <br />the system to avoid <br />discrimination <br /> <br /> Cities have a dear obligation to thor- <br />.oughly understand the laws governing <br /> <br />excludes a person based on factors such <br />as race, color, national origin, religion, <br />sex, age, or handicap disability. ' <br /> As the majority of our population <br />increases in age, the city should be <br />particularly sensitive to age discrimina- <br />· don. The federal statute specific, cqly .. <br />states that a discriminatory practice . <br />occurs when an employer refuses to <br /> <br />of whether an employer must make <br />reasonable accommodations for a par- <br />ticular disability whether mental or <br />physical. <br /> Under state lane,', the human rights <br />act (M.S.A. 363, et seq) adds rather <br />specific guidelines to the federal legisla- <br />tion. In particular, the Mirmesota <br />human rights act prohibits an employer <br />from discriminating against an <br />employee because of age, disability, <br />marital status, and status with regard to <br />public assistance, or membership or <br />activity in local human rights <br />commission. <br /> It also specifically declares disabled <br />individuals as a protected class and <br />requires the employer to make rea.son- <br />able accommodations for qualified can- <br />didates and employees. The law states <br />"the employer must attempt reasonable <br />accommodations unless the employer <br />can demonstrate that the accorm-noda- <br />tion will impose undue hardship on the <br />agency." The statute applies to <br />employers with 50 or more permanent, <br />full-time employees. Also the Minne- <br />sota human rights act sits a much <br />broader base for the protected class <br />with respect to age discrkninadon in <br />that it prohibits discrimination of any <br />individual over the age of 18. <br /> <br />Defining the job <br /> At the time a job vacancy occurs, the <br />city has an opportunity to review the <br />position and perform an objective needs <br />assessment. A needs assessment allon, s <br />the city to analyze the duties and <br />responsibilities of the position. A clear <br />and precise definition of the position <br />will dictate the essential criteria for <br />performance expectations and necessary. <br />candidate qualifications. <br /> In reviewing the essential job <br />requirements, the city. is initiating the <br />first step of minimizing legal problems <br /> <br />hire a.n individual who is 40 years of . that may result in the candidate screen- <br />age or more. (See, the age discrimina- '.."ing process. The ci~ should base the <br /> <br />tion in employment act of 1967, A.DEA <br />29 U.S.C. 621-34 1975, Supp. 1982). <br /> Federal taw also acknon,ledges people <br />who a.re disabled as being a ~oup <br />entitled to protected class status. The <br />American disability act addresses issues <br /> <br />criteria on the position not the individ- <br />ual Once the city establishes the <br />criteria, then the determination of qual- <br />ifications is £~xed. The qualifications <br />must be appropriate for the specific <br />position. <br /> <br />h~.!?f?Z££O';A. C:T~E5 ,' FEERUARY 199~ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.