My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
03/17/94
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
03/17/94
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2025 1:49:30 PM
Creation date
10/21/2003 2:42:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Board of Adjustment
Document Date
03/17/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
February 24~ 1994 <br /> <br />Mr. Ben De*ruer <br />Chairperson.~ <br />Board of Adjustment <br />City of l~m~ey <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Deemer, <br /> <br />As you may .know, I am in year 15 of a 5 year home remodeling project. To complete the <br />project I must construct an addition on the West side of my home. Unfortunately Anoka <br />County condemned additional right of way, moved the road closer to my home and <br />induced Ran~sey to increase their setback requirements. Because of theses events the <br />planned addition now requires a minor variance. <br /> <br />I request a 2,5' variance from the new 110' setback requirements. If granted, this would <br />produce an 95' setback from the centerline of Kamsey Boulevard which is greater than the <br />83' recommended by Ramsey's Planning and Zoning Commission. It is also noteworthy <br />that the plato)ed addition would be only slightly closer to the centerline of Ramsey <br />Boulevard than the North West comer of my existing garage. <br /> <br />As you can sge from the attached diagram the addition will not extend further to the South <br />than the sou0p wall of the present structure. Because the addition will not be any closer to <br />the South prgperty line than the present structure and the fight of way is well defined by <br />Anoka Courtly I see no value to be gained _fi, om another survey. In addition to the <br />requested va{'iance I request Anoka County s right of way survey be accepted in lieu ora <br />certificate ofisurvey and the centerline of the road be used to verify the requested 85' <br />setback. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.