Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson McGlone stated it is also problematic if some residents are required to pay for sod <br /> and the City does not do the same. However, he did not know how to decipher when the City <br /> can choose. <br /> Public Works Director Olson noted if the ditch had an adjacent field, it would be sodded but <br /> never maintained. He stated staff is trying to use its best judgment when restoring projects but <br /> the expectation is different so clarification is being requested. <br /> Chairperson McGlone asked whether there is a way to take photos prior to the project so the City <br /> can decide whether it is as good or better. <br /> City Engineer Himmer stated that can be done but raised a scenario where one property owner <br /> has a manicured lawn and irrigation system and another property owner does not maintain their <br /> yard. He asked whether it was fair for both property owners not to get the same. <br /> Councilmember Elvig suggested an option not be given but if it is a field, staff can use common <br /> sense. <br /> City Engineer Himmer noted at the last Public Works meeting an option was discussed that the <br /> property owner be presented with what the City will do for turf restoration and if the property <br /> owner wants something more, the City will reduce their cost by that amount. <br /> Chairperson McGlone stated some residents have said they'd prefer to do it themselves. <br /> City Engineer Himmer explained the problem is that residents don't follow through, resulting in <br /> erosion problems and sediment going into the storm sewers, incurring more costs for the City. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Chairperson McGlone, to recommend that the <br /> City Council adopt a Turf Establishment Policy, as presented, requiring the import of 4 inches of <br /> premium top soil, sod, and 30 -days of watering. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson McGlone and Councilmembers Elvig and Backous. <br /> Voting No: None. <br /> Public Works Committee consensus was reached to schedule discussion of the depth of top soil <br /> requirement for a future Public Works Committee meeting. <br /> Case #4: Discuss Turf Restoration Concerns on City Improvement Project #08 -34; the <br /> Bituminous Paving of 151 and 152 " Avenues, and Fluorine Street <br /> City Engineer Himmer reviewed the staff report. <br /> Chairperson McGlone noted this project involved resident complaints about the amount of rock <br /> in the topsoil. <br /> Public Works Committee / November 15, 2011 <br /> Page 7of15 <br />