Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Tossey stated he doubts Anoka will want to pay for a lobbyist for Ramsey's <br /> interchange but he thinks Anoka is not as opposed today as they were in the past to it becoming a <br /> freeway. He supported hiring a lobbyist, even if the City is able to get $10 million in bonding, <br /> because there is a desire to see something happen with the Highway 10 corridor from Elk River <br /> to Coon Rapids. Councilmember Tossey stated this is the time to look at it and put pressure on <br /> all elected officials, from Anoka County to the federal level. He believed this area had been <br /> neglected, as can be seen when driving the southwest part of the metro area. <br /> Councilmember Elvig stated he did not think Anoka has ever been opposed to doing something <br /> on Highway 10 and Anoka has made some efforts to get interchange space. Councilmember <br /> Elvig supported getting resolution between Ramsey and Anoka to work together in partnership <br /> and create a common voice, which will be a strong tool. Councilmember Elvig indicated <br /> Highway 47 is an Anoka issue that has become a Ramsey problem and asked if it should be <br /> included on the legislative agenda. <br /> City Administrator Ulrich noted Ramsey may have an advantage because it is ready to go with <br /> the Armstrong Boulevard interchange. However, due to the complexity with the different <br /> properties, Anoka may be a year or two behind Ramsey in its ability to complete an interchange <br /> at Fairoak Avenue. He suggested Priority 1 be the Armstrong Boulevard interchange and <br /> Priority 2 be the Fairoak Avenue interchange. <br /> Councilmember Elvig commented on the need to assure it is the right size and scale. <br /> Acting Mayor Wise felt that when talking about size and priority, the City also needs to address <br /> return on dollars. He noted Ramsey has people with letters of intent, which is more than Anoka <br /> has. <br /> Public Works Director Olson noted Highway 47 is not up to that level today and may not be <br /> within a year. <br /> Councilmember McGlone raised the issue of water treatment and the Council's support to make <br /> it a larger jurisdiction issue than just Ramsey. <br /> City Administrator Ulrich stated the best first step would then be a planning effort to get Ramsey <br /> in the queue for capital funding during a subsequent session. He explained how Ramsey can <br /> engage other communities, such as Nowthen or St. Francis, to be part of this effort and ask for <br /> funding to conduct a study on serving multiple cities with water. <br /> Public Works Director Olson explained why the issue of a water treatment facility is <br /> interregional and advised of staffs conversations with Nowthen, St. Francis, and Andover. He <br /> noted this should be discussed now because once approved it could take 3 -4 years to complete. <br /> Public Works Director Olson noted the Council wants to keep costs low to developers and he <br /> thinks the water treatment facility would show good "legs" if the City had a voice at the DNR. <br /> City Council Work Session / December 6, 2011 <br /> Page 10 of 12 <br />