My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/10/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council - 01/10/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:03:54 PM
Creation date
1/11/2012 3:23:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/10/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
447
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Engineer Himmer explained it is for new developers building new infrastructure so while <br />the City is phasing out assessments to residents, this fee would be to developers to cover those <br />costs. <br />Councilmember Backous noted a correction to the staff report that the $100 administrative fee at <br />120 residential would be $12,000, not $1,200. <br />Planning Intern Brama indicated he would make that correction. <br />Councilmember Elvig asked about the street light fee. <br />Public Works Director Olson explained the City hires Connexus to install City -issued street <br />lights and three years operation and maintenance is required. Staff recommends keeping the <br />three years of operation and maintenance fees but allow the developer to hire the contractor they <br />want to use. The developer will still have to buy the streetlights and pay for installation but that <br />work would not be done through the City. <br />Councilmember Strommen asked whether a particular light would have to be installed. <br />Public Works Director Olson answered in the affirmative and indicated the street light would <br />have to meet City standards. <br />Planning Intern Brama recommended traffic signs be shifted from the City to the developer at <br />$225 per sign. Based on Scenario #2, this would reduce fees charged by the City to the <br />developer by $3,375. Planning Intern Brama noted the Sewer Access Charge (SAC) <br />administrative fee has been considered by the Council and reduced from $200 per address to $25 <br />per address in 2012. <br />Finance Officer Lund explained staff has to track SAC fees, submit reports to verify the building <br />permit, submit reports, and cut the check to the Met Council. <br />Councilmember Elvig asked why staff is recommending reducing that fee. <br />Finance Officer Lund explained the fee was $200 per address but staff felt that fee was too high <br />and a fee of $25 is more justifiable. <br />Public Works Director Olson noted the Met Council charges $2,230 and the City added $200 to <br />that fee to cover administrative costs. The City's portion went directly into the Sewer Fund. <br />Finance Officer Lund explained all fees go into separate funds and the only fee related to the <br />General Fund is the administrative fee for erosion control and the certificate of occupancy. <br />Planning Intern Brama noted the Water/Sewer Trunk fee is listed but staff will not know the <br />change until after the rate study is completed. <br />City Council Work Session / November 22, 2011 <br />Page 2 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.