Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Elvig stated he understood the Metropolitan Council WAC Committee is <br />engaged in a large study that will look at demographics and estimate growth rates, using that <br />criteria relating to availability of water. That study will be used by Mn/DOT to determine <br />infrastructure for the next 10-15 years. Councilmember Elvig stated his concern that if it is <br />determined Ramsey will have a hard time growing to capacity because it does not have water <br />infrastructure, then other infrastructure will be reduced. He believed it was in the City's interest <br />to have a policy that water is a regional problem, not just a Ramsey problem. <br />Public Works Director Olson indicated that the City of Burnsville got one-third to one-half of its <br />costs from the Legislature so there is some benefit by doing a water treatment facility. He stated <br />staff can provide estimated costs and what would be needed from the Legislature. <br />Councilmember Elvig pointed out this goes directly to rates and fees and if Ramsey wants to be <br />competitive, it needs to be proactive to get a subsidy and build the system. <br />Public Works Director Olson cautioned that there could be a change in policy at a regional level <br />that puts Ramsey in a bind if it doesn't plan for the future. That is why staff recommends the <br />water treatment facility not be removed. It would put the City in same situation as it is in with <br />roads. Public Works Director Olson noted the City needs to plan for the future tax base and <br />infrastructure by looking at all aspects of water, sewer, and utilities before making those <br />decisions. <br />City Administrative Ulrich stated the builder's meeting will be held in December or January and <br />that information will be brought back to the Council. <br />Deputy City Administrator Nelson asked about the items staff identified outside the scope of the <br />sewer and water updates and whether staff should proceed based on the recommendation. <br />Acting Mayor Wise stated he does not like basing building permit fees on project valuation <br />because it takes the same effort by the inspector. <br />Council consensus was reached to adopt the proposed changes in the development fees/charges, <br />direct staff to request bids for both a comprehensive sewer and water system study, and set the <br />developer Open House meeting for Tuesday, December 6, 2011, from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. <br />2) Discuss Support of Fiscal Disparities Resolution <br />City Administrator Ulrich reviewed the staff report. He recommended the City continue the <br />current fiscal disparities policy because of the net benefit. <br />Councilmembers McGlone, Tossey, and Acting Mayor Wise indicated that while they did not <br />find fiscal disparities to be fair, they would support the resolution because of the net benefit to <br />Ramsey. <br />Council consensus was reached to support adoption of a resolution requesting no change in <br />Fiscal Disparities. <br />City Council Work Session / November 22, 2011 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />