My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/10/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/10/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:04:04 PM
Creation date
1/11/2012 3:44:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
01/10/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Work Session 2. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 01/10/2012 <br />By: Tim Himmer, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Discuss Potential Improvements to Garnet Street NW, located within NOW AND THEN ESTATES <br />Background: <br />Street maintenance activities on Garnet Street NW, between 167th Avenue and the BROOKFIELD subdivision, <br />have not occurred on the City's standard maintenance plan. Maintenance activities have been delayed in this area <br />for several reasons over the years; including the idea that adjacent development would expand to this area and thus <br />result in new street layouts and/or installation of utilities, poor subgrade, and discussions with the residents <br />regarding potential fixes and assessments. This roadway segment is one of the lowest rated streets in the City, and <br />accounts for a large portion of the City's annual patching budget. <br />Staff has met with the residents along this street on several occasions over the past 3 years, and they feel that the <br />City has not properly maintained this street by providing regularly scheduled overlays and sealcoats and should <br />therefore be responsible for the premature deterioration. They have also complained about damage to the road that <br />occurred during construction activities associated with the BROOKFIELD subdivision. They have stated that they <br />would not be supportive of the options outlined to date, due to cost considerations, and would most likely <br />counter -petition the improvement. They have asked that the road continue to be patched to a good condition until <br />such time that an improvement project can be initiated that would keep assessments in line with what other <br />neighborhoods are paying for a similar improvement. They were also interested in the status of the discussion <br />related to a potential franchise fee, as that may make the costs more palatable. <br />This item was most recently discussed by the Public Works Committee on November 15, 2011, and the direction <br />from that meeting was to approach the residents with a proposal to reconstruct the roadway with concrete curb & <br />gutter, a sidewalk, and all utilities. The residents would only be required to contribute 50% of the road costs, and <br />the City would address the required soil corrections with the utility installation. There would be no utility costs <br />attributed to the residents at this time; they would just have to pay trunk and connection charges in the future <br />if/when they decide to connect to the municipal utility system. Attached is an estimate of the costs associated with <br />such an improvement. <br />This proposal was outlined to the residents at an open house on December 14, 2011. The consensus from those in <br />attendance was to wait for the possible franchise fee funding option that may be utilized in the future for roadway <br />improvements. They also expressed concern with the inclusion of concrete curb and gutter, utilities, and a <br />sidewalk. They wanted to maintain the rural character of their neighborhood, and not cause a chain reaction of <br />development that might drive some of their neighbors out. Attached are a few e-mails received by staff related to <br />this project. <br />Observations: <br />To date staff has received comments from 8 of the potential 13 assessable property owners; 6 have said they would <br />like to wait on the possible franchise fee funding options & request delaying improvements (keep patching), 1 has <br />said he is interested in fixing the street as soon as possible (regardless of cost), and 1 remains undecided. <br />While going through the long term street maintenance and reconstruction initiative, it was discussed that we could <br />utilize the Public Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund as seed money for this program and initiate a pilot project. <br />Staff was considering this segment of Garnet Street as that kick-off project; an example for what the program would <br />provide and accomplish. This improvement is currently included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as a <br />2012 project but there is not money available in the PIR fund to this extent to complete this improvement (see <br />below). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.