My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/17/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/17/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:04:25 PM
Creation date
1/12/2012 4:34:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
01/17/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TITLE: <br />Dedicated park land does not belong to the City, but rather is "The property of the dedicator or his successor <br />in interest, in which the City, as trustee for the benefit of the public and not in its own right as such has such <br />an interest as is necessary to enjoy the use thereof as a public [park]" Headley v. City of Northfield 35 <br />N.W.2d 605 (1949). <br />To remove the "park use" designation will require a district court action with notification to the person /entity <br />who dedicated the property, adjacent property owners and the Attorney General's Office. The Attorney <br />General acts somewhat as the caretaker of the public's interest in property held in trust. The court will then <br />decide if the park purpose restriction may be removed, and if so, who is entitled to receive title to the <br />property. Meaning, even if the "park use" designation is removed the courts may still require the parcel to be <br />given back to the original owner. <br />The City Attorney estimates the time for a district court action to remove the park restrictions is six months <br />to one year, the variable depending on who needs to be given notice of the action, the difficulty of <br />notification, plus how much opposition by interested parties may be brought opposing City action. Interested <br />parties include neighbors who may not want to lose the park amenity. <br />A search for heirs or successors could be a very difficult, lengthy and expensive process for little gain since <br />the City will most likely not end up with title to the property unless the City can convince the determined fee <br />owner or entity in title to convey fee title for the property to the City. The City attorney does not recommend <br />the City undertaking this process unless there is an obvious benefit. The estimated cost to go through this <br />process is from $2,000 - $5,000 per parcel. <br />PROCESS /COST OF RETURNING A PROPERTY TO ITS ORIGINAL OWNER (I. E. THE DEVELOPER) : <br />Attorney will review at work session. <br />PROCESS /COST USING LAND FOR WETLAND BANKING: <br />In order to use city owned land for wetland banking, delineation must take place. That is, the City would <br />need to hire a certified consultant to determine the extent of existing wetlands (vegetation, soils, and <br />hydrology) per parcel. After delineation, the City can then entertain the option of banking. Delineation is <br />estimated to cost $1,000- $1,500 per site. Therefore, there should be a significant desire to use a subject <br />property for wetland banking before any further action is taken. <br />Staff is recommending that most of the identified properties not be used for wetland banking for multiple <br />reasons. (1) many parcels are too high in elevation; costs to the City would be significant (2) many parcels are <br />already wetland (3) many parcels are surrounded by developed land and there is no value in banking. NOTE: <br />Properties 06 and 11 are candidates for banking -- depending on how the properties are developed. <br />PROCESS FOR THE CITY TO SELL LAND (CONSIDERING IT IS SELLABLE): <br />In order to sell City owned land a "land sale ordinance" must be passed. This requires two meetings. First a <br />public hearing and introduction to the City Council. Second, a meeting to adopt the "land sale ordinance." <br />Following the second meeting is a 30 day grace period in which the public can petition the adopted ordinance. <br />There are a four (4) parcels Staff would like to discuss in more detail with the City Council. Parcels #22 & #34 are <br />potential properties for quiet title action. Parcel #11 is eligible for sale, but will require right -of -way dedication <br />and platting. Platting of the property could be accomplished by a future developer as part of the development <br />process. Alternatively, the City could choose to plat the developable portion as outlot, reserving the necessary <br />right -of -way, and make available to convey the outlot to a future developer. Finally, Staff would like to discuss the <br />potential sale of a parcel known as Peltzer Park. <br />Recommendation: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.