My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 01/17/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2012
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 01/17/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:19:30 AM
Creation date
1/13/2012 4:31:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
01/17/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Backous noted staff has more background in these issues to make the judgment <br />and the Council can review, after the fact, to keep an eye on the process. He felt the policy <br />should include a process for staff to handle emergency situations. <br />Chairperson McGlone asked if that is an option if there is a public health issue. He noted the <br />process could be expedited if the property owner proves they have exhausted all other financing <br />avenues, waives the public hearing, and agrees to a 25% surcharge. <br />City Engineer Himmer stated the policy can be drafted to circumvent the Council process should <br />there be an imminent health concern, the property owner waives the public hearing and <br />assessment, proves they have exhausted all other funding mechanisms, and agrees to the 25% <br />surcharge. If the property owner will not waive the public hearing, then the full process would <br />be required. <br />Public Works Director Olson explained if the property owner is not willing to make the <br />correction or follow the process, the Building Official has the right to condemn the house. <br />The Committee discussed whether assessments are paid in full at the time of ownership transfer. <br />City Attorney Goodrich advised that assessments can follow the property if the buyer is willing <br />to assume those costs. <br />City Engineer Himmer raised the option of offering incentive such as reimbursing a percentage <br />of the surcharge if the property owner finds alternative financing and pays the City back. <br />Councilmember Backous stated the City needs to insure the property covers all costs incurred <br />and he did not support the City turning into a bank with a complicated process. <br />The Committee discussed different terms and percentage of discounts that would cover the <br />City's costs while still offering an incentive for the property owner to find alternate financing. <br />Councilmember Wise supported a shorter payback term and higher discount. <br />The Public Works Committee reached consensus to recommend offering a 5% discount on the <br />surcharge if a lump payment is received within the first 2-5 years. <br />City Engineer Himmer agreed because if waiving the assessment process, the City's costs will be <br />minimal. <br />Chairman McGlone suggested some of the restoration items be offered to the property owner in <br />an effort to keep down costs. <br />City Engineer Himmer recommended that be left to staff's discretion through negotiation instead <br />of making it part of the policy. He asked whether the Committee supported a minimum or <br />maximum requirement for proving financial ability. <br />Public Works Committee / December 13, 2011 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.