Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Elvig .stated his understanding that the HRA had remedies in place if they <br />extended but now the deadline is passed and there is no documentation in place. <br />Development Manager Lazan noted Toti /Suite Living had paid to extend but the deadline is gone <br />so the HRA could notice them it will cancel the contract or bring another tool forward to put <br />Toti /Suite Living back under agreement. He explained the partial closing is in rough form and <br />he will discuss that option again tomorrow with Toti /Suite Living. It would involve a partial <br />payment of half the total sale value up front, close the sale, and the HRA would carry a six - <br />month note that would have to be fulfilled prior to starting construction. That option allows <br />Toti /Suite Living to close with the existing environmental work so they can focus on financing <br />construction. <br />Commissioner Elvig stated he remains concerned because the deadline was passed and the HRA <br />did not act on it. He noted a contract is in place, has not been met, and been extended four times <br />previously. Commissioner Elvig stated this is an important project and piece of ground and <br />holding it has locked other's ability to come to Ramsey for senior assisted housing. He believed <br />this should be discussed by the HRA on a timely basis; however, it was still not scheduled for <br />discussion. <br />Commissioner Ramsey asked what the drop -dead date is. <br />Development Manager Lazan stated it was January 15 but it is not uncommon to let that date go <br />by and get to a decision point. He stated he plans to bring a proposal forward for the HRA's <br />consideration at its February 14, 2012, meeting. <br />Commissioner Strommen stated she would be willing to meet in special session to respond to <br />real estate negotiations. She indicated she is also concerned the deadline was January 15 and the <br />HRA is not meeting again for a month from that date. She stated the HRA needs to be able to <br />respond. <br />Commissioner Tossey concurred that discussion needs to occur and a contract should mean <br />something. He stated the HRA needs to consider if it is willing to let it go on and on and he <br />believed holding that discussion a month beyond the drop -dead date is too long. <br />Commissioner Ramsey stated he is also concerned that is too long but noted this perspective <br />purchaser has paid a significant amount of money for the extensions and that is not refundable. <br />Commissioner Ramsey agreed the HRA needed to make sure it holds contracts to a higher value <br />but he believed Toti/Suite Living was committed because it has paid $110,000 in non - refundable <br />fees. <br />Chairperson McGlone concurred the HRA was at a point of concern, noting Toti/Suite Living <br />had passed contract deadlines four times. <br />Development Manager Lazen clarified that the other times staff had prepared and presented an <br />extension before the deadline. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / January 24, 2012 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />