#11-11-233 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

9. That as part of the 2008 Permit request, the fire suppression requirement was provisionally waived by the Fire Chief and Building Official, as permitted by MN State Building Code Chapter 1306, due to the limited term of the permit (three [3] years). 10. That as part of the 2008 Permit review process, it was clearly indicated to the Applicant that at the expiration of the 2008 Permit, any application for an extension or for a new Interim Use Permit would be subject to the fire suppression requirement. 11. That the Applicant is required to install a fire suppression system that is approved by the City and operational by September 1, 2012. 12. That the Applicant shall adhere to specific benchmarks outlined in the Permit to ensure timely installation of a fire suppression system prior to the expiration of the Permit; failure to comply with any of the benchmarks shall be cause for the City to review the Permit and consider revocation. The benchmarks are as follows: • Complete Automatic Fire Suppression Permit Application submittal on or before March 1, 2012; and • Payment of Automatic Fire Suppression Permit Application fees and issuance of Automatic Fire Suppression Permit on or before July 1, 2012; and • Automatic fire suppression system approved by City and operational on or before September 1, 2012. 13. That the proposed use will not adversely impact traffic in the area. 14. That the proposed use will not be dangerous or detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. 15. That the proposed use will not substantially or adversely impair the use, enjoyment or market value of surrounding properties. 16. That the proposed use will be operated and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and such use will not change the essential character of the area. 17. That the proposed use will not create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services. 18. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 19. That the proposed use will not be disturbing or hazardous to existing or future neighboring uses. 20. That the proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials and equipment and conditions of operation that may be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare, by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke or glare. 21. That the proposed use will be in accordance with the objectives of the intent of Section 117- 52 (Interim Use Permits) of the City Code. RESOLUTION #11 -11 -233 Page 2 of 3