My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2012
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:10:27 AM
Creation date
1/27/2012 9:16:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/02/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
()Highlighting the areas of change and graying out areas <br />where no rezonings are proposed (as shown here) can clearly <br />communicate where district changes are planned. <br />Remap applicable portions of the <br />municipality to implement development <br />policies. <br />A comprehensive plan often contains nu- <br />merous land -use policies that describe how <br />areas should redevelop. In areas where <br />policies describe a plan for redevelopment <br />that differs from what is permitted now, new <br />districts may be appropriate. The following <br />mapping principles will assist in identify- <br />ing how these zoning map changes should <br />occur. <br />1. The process should begin by identifying <br />key areas where change is desired, noting <br />the relationship of current zoning to the <br />proposed land -use or redevelopment policy. <br />If the current zoning is able to accommodate <br />such redevelopment, then there is no need <br />for the zoning map to change. If the plan <br />does not contain specific land -use recom- <br />mendations, or if the recommendations <br />City of Baltimore <br />are too vague to be mapped, additional <br />area -based planning may be necessary. It is <br />essential to understand the type of use and <br />form desired in order to identify appropriate <br />zoning. <br />2. Where current zoning districts do not <br />achieve or accommodate the desired <br />change, the most appropriate new districts <br />for such land -use or redevelopment policy <br />should be identified. In some cases, remap- <br />ping may be a mix of zoning districts. <br />3. To start the mapping process, the general <br />Location of new districts should be placed <br />on the zoning map. While a plan may pro- <br />vide some general guidance regarding loca- <br />tion, eventually the zoning map will need to <br />be refined to specifically identify the parcels <br />to which these districts will be applied. <br />Comparison of the existing Land-use pattern <br />with the land -use directions provided or <br />implied by the plan will help to define and <br />refine the boundaries of the re -map area. <br />Studies of aerial photography or site inspec- <br />tion should also be conducted. <br />4. Finally, two key implications of remap- <br />ping should be considered. The first is the <br />creation of nonconformities. The second <br />is the timing related to achieving the rede- <br />velopment potential. Not all zoning map <br />changes should occur immediately upon the <br />adoption of new zoning text. In some cases, <br />where there is a policy or desire to have an <br />area redevelop differently over time, it may <br />not be appropriate to change the zoning <br />immediately because the market and other <br />development conditions may not be in place <br />to bring about that change. Remapping is <br />based on redevelopment potential, includ- <br />ing factors outside of the zoning ordinance. <br />If current or anticipated market conditions <br />are not yet in place, remapping could lead to <br />extensive nonconformities and discourage <br />reinvestment and maintenance, thus creat- <br />ing more, rather than less, blight conditions. <br />In this case a zoning change is better re- <br />served for a later time when that redevelop- <br />ment potential begins to be demonstrated <br />by requests for rezoning. <br />Apply policy - specific districts when <br />remapping to resolve specific conditions or <br />achieve specific purposes. <br />There may be a need to draft new districts <br />to achieve specific purposes; consequently, <br />these require special considerations in their <br />mapping. Examples of some of these types <br />of districts include transit - oriented devel- <br />opment, mixed use, campus districts, and <br />overlay districts. <br />Transit - Oriented Development Districts: <br />Transit- oriented development is a spe- <br />cific type of mixed use development that <br />increases density and allows for a mix of <br />pedestrian- oriented commercial and resi- <br />dential uses around transit stops in order <br />to encourage the use of transit and reduce <br />reliance on the automobile. Generally, the <br />accepted planning principle for TOD is to <br />consider the area within a quarter -mile <br />radius around the transit stop as the ge- <br />ography for a TOD district. However, when <br />applied to the zoning map, a TOD district <br />cannot be applied as that circle. Instead, <br />mapping should use the quarter -mile rule as <br />a reference point to assess the character of <br />existing development in that area. <br />A TOD district should be mapped in <br />those areas that can accommodate higher <br />density and a mix of uses. In more urban <br />areas, where a natural mix of commercial <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 12.11 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION Ipage 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.