Laserfiche WebLink
fa <br />p oo <br />A da <br />00 <br />1=Z:1 0E3 <br />r� o <br />walk <br />q I <br />r <br />MEI EMI <br />• <br />9cJIo D 1 D fl <br />0 <br />uN <br />00 11 <br />1 <br />A....4 <br />G <br />EWOrm <br />fa <br />p oo <br />A da <br />00 <br />1=Z:1 0E3 <br />r� o <br />walk <br />q I <br />r <br />MEI EMI <br />• <br />9cJIo D 1 D fl <br />fa <br />p <br />i <br />'0 <br />re <br />.: <br />-� <br />Raw <br />r� o <br />walk <br />C D <br />r <br />MEI EMI <br />0 <br />uN <br />00 11 <br />1 <br />A....4 <br />G <br />tO <br />I <br />o <br />d <br />i <br />l <br />J <br />p reer.ir <br />� <br />Erar <br />0 <br />On the other hand, a true overlay dis- <br />trict is one that regulates certain specific <br />elements common to a geographic area and <br />responds to the uniqueness of that area, <br />which is appropriately zoned with a number <br />of different districts. Environmental issues <br />are one type of condition that are often best <br />addressed through an overlay district, as the <br />overlay districts impose restrictions that pro- <br />mote environmental sensitivity but allow the <br />area to develop as the appropriate mix of dis- <br />tricts and intensities. while overlay districts <br />are a useful zoning tool, their application <br />should be limited so that they specifically <br />address a particular issue that applies over a <br />larger geography. From a mapping perspec- <br />tive, the specific elements that the overlay <br />district is trying to regulate should guide the <br />location of the district's boundaries. <br />Remap existing planned unit developments <br />and other large -scale developments. <br />Many municipalities have used planned unit <br />developments as a way to accommodate <br />new development within the framework <br />LEGEND <br />Q Single Family Dwellings <br />2 -3 Unit Dwellings <br />Multifamily Dwellings <br />Q Mapping new district boundaries can be especially challenging in <br />areas with existing development of different use types or densities. <br />Charles Lerable <br />of an outdated ordinance. The goal of a <br />comprehensive zoning update is to create <br />a development environment where modern <br />development types can take place by- right, <br />without having to go through a series of ap- <br />provals. Once a new ordinance is adopted, <br />older adopted planned unit developments <br />will remain in place, so it is good policy to <br />try to integrate the requirements of planned <br />unit developments into the zoning ordi- <br />nance. This will allow each PUD to be evalu- <br />ated against the underlying zoning, and <br />remapping can occur where new districts <br />better align with the intent of the land -use <br />and design requirements contained within <br />the planned unit development ordinance. <br />This can encourage the repeal of PUDs, <br />where appropriate, as the approved condi- <br />tions contained within these regulations can <br />be continued under zoning. <br />As a general rule, if the owner of a <br />planned unit development is in compliance <br />with all requirements and conditions, the <br />PUD cannot be repealed by the municipality <br />because it is a special approval granted to <br />the property owner. Therefore, these approv- <br />als will remain in place unless a change is <br />requested by the owner. For planned unit <br />developments, typically three options are <br />available to the owner: <br />1. If the new districts and regulations match <br />the PUD regulations, making the PUD un- <br />necessary, that planned unit development <br />can be repealed at the owner's request. This <br />offers a benefit to the property owner, be- <br />cause any changes to the development that <br />comply with the zoning ordinance can occur <br />without special approvals. <br />z. if the owner would like to retain the PUD <br />but link to the new zoning ordinance, the <br />planned unit development can be repeated <br />and replaced with a new PUD that links to <br />the new zoning ordinance. <br />3. Finally, the PUD can be maintained as is, <br />in which case the municipality must keep <br />the original zoning ordinance on file as a <br />reference point for the planned unit devel- <br />opment regulations, since it is tied to zoning <br />regulations in place at the time of approval. <br />Ensure consistency with the future <br />land -use plan. <br />Some municipalities are required to main- <br />tain consistency with an future adopted <br />land -use plan. Even when consistency is not <br />required, general alignment with the future <br />land -use plan is recommended so that land - <br />use policies reinforce zoning regulations. <br />The following principles are useful for ensur- <br />ing consistency: <br />1. Consistency requires synchronization <br />between land -use categories and zoning <br />districts. It is important to understand that <br />Land-use categories are, by nature, more <br />general than zoning districts. An apt analogy <br />is that any land -use category is generally a <br />basket that holds a variety of zoning districts. <br />For example, a future land -use map will <br />identify areas as single - family residential; <br />however, those areas may contain a number <br />of single- family districts of different densities. <br />It will be important, once an area is identified <br />as single- family, to determine exactly which <br />single - family district is appropriate. <br />2. Properties should be assigned a zoning <br />district that best fits the current use of the <br />property unless the future land -use plan <br />indicates an alternative land use. In this <br />case, the municipality may choose to either <br />rezone the lot now or wait until a rezoning is <br />more appropriate. In some cases, because a <br />comprehensive rezoning looks at a munici- <br />pality on a parcel level, this more specific <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 12.11 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASS©CLATIDN 1 page 6 <br />