My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/13/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2011
>
Agenda - Council - 12/13/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:22:47 PM
Creation date
1/31/2012 3:53:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/13/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• If the area of restoration is within a rural ditch section reserved for stormwater management, salvaged <br />topsoil can be used to promote infiltration. <br />• 4" uniform depth of installation. <br />• Turf requirements - sod will be used exclusively <br />• Do we want to consider seeding in ditch and/or ponding easement areas, to include low maintenance <br />native seed conducive for sandy soils? <br />• Require the contractor to water for 30 days and establish root growth, at which point it becomes the <br />obligation of the property owner. Resident notification letters to be delivered as the project is nearing <br />completion to remind them of their responsibility for long term maintenance. <br />One thing is very clear as it relates to turf establishment on public improvement projects going forward; we need to <br />be as descriptive as possible in the feasibility study phase of the project so residents can fully understand what is <br />being proposed. We may also want to discuss the use of public right-of-way in general to discourage the installation <br />of planter beds, irrigation lines, landscaping (trees, shrubs, etc.), retaining walls, and other obstructions. All of <br />these items add costs to the overall project, and by replacing them to "as good or better condition" we are setting <br />ourselves up for future impacts with subsequent projects. <br />Funding Source: <br />Development of the policy is being handled with staff time. Funding for the actual implementation will depend on <br />the specific improvement project and could include enterprise funds, general fund, property assessments, state aid, <br />TIF, etc. Regardless of the final policy developed there will be cost considerations for each project, which must be <br />identified and communicated prior to construction so there is no confusion during the approval process or <br />installation. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff requests feedback on the outlined turf establishment policy so it can be advanced for formal adoption at the <br />Council level prior to the start of 2012 construction season. <br />Committee Action: <br />Based upon discussion. <br />MnDOT Topsoil Specifications <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Brian Olson Brian Olson 11/09/2011 12:53 PM <br />Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 11/10/2011 02:04 PM <br />Form Started By: Tim Himmer Started On: 11/08/2011 <br />Final Approval Date: 11/10/2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.