My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/13/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2011
>
Agenda - Council - 12/13/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:22:47 PM
Creation date
1/31/2012 3:53:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/13/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session 6. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 12/13/2011 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Public Hearing to Introduce Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of Fluorine St NW Right -of -Way and Certain Drainage <br />and Utility Easements Adjacent to and on 14241 Fluorine St NW; Case of City of Ramsey <br />Background: <br />This past summer, a building permit application for the construction of a detached accessory building at 14241 <br />Fluorine Street NW was processed. Due to the size of the property, the total allowable square footage for accessory <br />buildings was limited to 1,800, which meant the property owner needed to reduce the size of a small, existing shed <br />slightly to accommodate the forty foot by forty-two foot (40' x 42') detached garage. The property owner <br />commissioned the preparation of a certificate of survey to calculate the actual area of the property. The results of <br />that survey confirmed that the property was, in fact, just shy of one (1) acre and thus, limited to 1,800 square feet of <br />accessory building space. <br />Through this process, two issues were discovered. First, the property owner discovered that his property size was <br />diminished somewhat due to platted right-of-way for a cul-de-sac bulb that was never constructed. Secondly, it was <br />discovered that a public trail slightly encroached onto his property. As a result of this information, the property <br />owner expressed interest in having the excess right-of-way vacated in exchange for dedicating a trail easement to <br />address the encroachment. As required in City Code, a public hearing must be held when considering vacation <br />of right-of-way and/or easements, which is the purpose of this case. <br />Notification: <br />In accordance with State Statute and City Code, Staff attempted to notify all property owners within 350 of the <br />Subject Property of the Public Hearing via Standard US Mail. A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the <br />Anoka County Union. <br />Observations: <br />When the Flintwood Hills subdivision was approved in 1976, Fluorine St NW was platted with a cul-de-sac bubble, <br />but that bubble was never constructed. Since the cul-de-sac bubble was never constructed, the property owner <br />inquired about the potential to vacate the platted right-of-way. This would not only slightly increase the property <br />size but would also eliminate a lawful, nonconforming designation of the home with regard to front yard setbacks. <br />The home and attached garage are approximately fifteen (15) feet from the platted right-of-way of the cul-de-sac <br />bubble. Vacating this right-of-way would result in the home and attached garage complying with the standard front <br />yard setback, thus eliminating the lawful, nonconforming designation. The property owner has stated that he is <br />open to formally dedicating a trail easement for the trail encroachment in exchange for the right-of-way vacation. <br />Should the right-of-way be vacated, a portion of the drainage and utility easements on the property would also need <br />to be vacated. Staff has contacted all utilities regarding this potential vacation of easement area and none have <br />relayed any concerns. While a portion of the easements would be vacated, a ten (10) foot drainage and utility <br />easement would be retained along the newly established front property line, consistent with current standards. <br />Recommendation: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.