My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/06/2012 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council - 02/06/2012 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:07:09 PM
Creation date
2/2/2012 4:20:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
02/06/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BO LTON , 1 ■ <br />Consulting Engineers & Surveyors <br />2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 •Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 <br />Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 <br />www. bolton- menk.com <br />MEMORANDUM <br />Date: February 1, 2012 <br />To: Tim Himmer, City Engineer <br />From: David Martini <br />Subject: Water and Sanitary Sewer Study Assumptions <br />As a first step needed to move forward with the City's Sanitary Sewer and Water studies, it is necessary <br />to confirm information related to the City's anticipated growth. At the City Council work session on <br />February 6th, Bolton & Menk requests that the following information be discussed and confirmed: <br />• Growth and population projections — This discussion is needed to confirm the projected <br />ultimate population of the City that will be served by water and sewer. This information will be <br />used to project the ultimate demands on the water and sewer systems and will be used to <br />determine the needed water and sewer allocations. <br />• Density assumptions — To determine appropriate sizing for facilities serving different locations <br />within the City, it is necessary to confirm the City's density assumptions. This information will <br />be used to ensure that the size and capacity of the infrastructure identified in the studies is <br />adequate to accommodate the projected growth of the City. <br />• Ultimate Service Area — Since the entire City is not planned to be served by water and sewer, it <br />is necessary to confirm the areas that will be provided with service. This information will be used <br />to determine preliminary locations of interceptor pipes, wells, storage facilities, etc. In addition, <br />it is necessary to estimate the timing of development in these areas. This information will be used <br />to determine the number of new service connections or population increases for each growth area <br />throughout the entire study period. This will be necessary for the timing of the CIP as it relates to <br />locating new water towers, wells, lift stations, interceptors, etc. <br />• Service to or from adjacent jurisdictions — Since some of the City's growth is projected to <br />occur near the City limits, the City should consider whether or not it will serve adjacent <br />jurisdictions with water and sewer service in the future. Conversely, the City should consider if it <br />would accept service from an adjacent jurisdiction if it is determined to be the most feasibly way <br />to provide service to islands of growth along the City's limits. <br />To assist the City Council with their discussions, we offer the following factors, which have an impact on <br />the costs and feasibility of expansion of the water and sanitary sewer systems. <br />Expansion of municipal water and sanitary sewer service can be done most effectively when development <br />occurs in stages progressing outward from areas with existing service. This allows for relatively short <br />extension of mains to service development. The extended mains need to have capacity to service the <br />ultimate MUSA boundary which requires planning and investment in oversizing of facilities. <br />Less cost effective development is to allow for leap-frog development which requires longer main <br />extensions, some of which pass along or through properties which are not ready to develop and which do <br />not wish to pay trunk and lateral assessments or fees. This requires an investment not only in oversizing <br />but also requires either the City or the developer to carry the costs of the project until connection charges <br />F:IRAMS \R1310450311 CorreslD. Docs\Council Work Session Memo 2- 1- 12.doc <br />DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW <br />Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.