Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Commissioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to table Mr. Vevea's <br />request for site plan review until the special Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled <br />for October 16, 1990. <br /> <br />Further discussion. The Commission consensus was that prior to the October 16, 1990 meeting, <br />Mr. Vevea should meet with the City Engineer to review drainage plans for the property and Ms. <br />Frolik was instructed to place Mr. Vevea's case as Item #1 on the October 16, 1990 Agenda. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Bawden, Deemer, LaDue <br />and Thorud. Voting No: Commissioner Terry. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. <br /> <br />Case #6: Discussion Regarding Possible Modifications to the Procedure for <br /> Processing Subdivision Applications. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik recalled that on September 4, 1990, Commissioner Deemer requested that a case be <br />added to the Commissions Agenda regarding the possibility of modifying the procedure for <br />processing subdivision applications to require that the sketch plan be reviewed by the Park and <br />Recreation Commission prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Ms. Frolik stated that <br />requiring subdivisions to be first reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission would result in <br />two months being devoted to sketch plan review, which might be considered excessive since the <br />intent of sketch plan is a conceptual review. Ms. Frolik stated that another concern of hers is that <br />the Park and Recreation Commission has been charged with reviewing plats for appropriate park <br />dedication requirements and the Planning and Zoning Commission should be assured that when <br />they receive the preliminary plat, the recommendations of the Park and Recreation Commission <br />will be reflected on it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer stated that his reasons for bringing this up for discussion was his concern <br />that preliminary plats are being approved with contingencies that are never followed up on. <br />Commissioner Deemer stated that, in his opinion, the process either had to be modified or the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission should be added to the final review process of a plat. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto stated that if the procedure is modified, then the City would be asking the Park and <br />Recreation Commission to review a sketch plan for park dedication without benefit of any <br />topography information which is available at preliminary plat stage. <br /> <br />The Commission consensus was to retain the platting procedure in its current order, knowing that <br />if it becomes necessary, the Planning Commission can call for a preview of the preliminary plat <br />prior to scheduling the preliminary plat public heating. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to adjourn the regular <br />meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Bawden, Deemer, LaDue, <br />Terry and Thorud. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. <br /> <br />The regular meeting adjourned at 10:13 p.m. <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning Commission/October 2, 1990 <br /> Page 7 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />