My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 12/13/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2011
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 12/13/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:20:27 PM
Creation date
2/14/2012 8:45:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
12/13/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson McGlone requested guidance on the level of income required by other agencies that <br /> offer assistance. <br /> City Engineer Himmer indicated the County uses a maximum income of $12,000 during the <br /> previous year. He asked if written documentation should be required that the property owner has <br /> investigated other options and been unsuccessful. <br /> Councilmember Backous indicated that would be difficult to "police" and felt the surcharge <br /> could be used as a deterrent. <br /> City Engineer Himmer stated with the last consideration, the property owner provided an e -mail <br /> response denying participation in other programs. He asked whether the property owner should <br /> be required to submit something in writing or staff should track it down to verify that is the case. <br /> Public Works Director Olson noted the current policy is a good system because the surcharge is a <br /> deterrent but not high enough of be a penalty, it is flexibly written, and the property owner is <br /> required to provide written communication showing they have been turned down for financing. <br /> Chairperson McGlone supported requiring proof from the applicant that they have done due <br /> diligence. <br /> Councilmember Wise indicated it is difficult to think of every possible scenario and the policy <br /> can be tweaked in the future, if needed. <br /> City Engineer Himmer stated staff will prepare a report for presentation to the City Council. <br /> Case #2: Consider Requirements for Information that Must be Included on <br /> Certificates of Survey <br /> City Engineer Himmer reviewed the staff report. <br /> Chairperson McGlone asked if this is required. by Code. He felt there was an expectation by <br /> owners that the City enforced the Code so their building/home must be up to Code. Chairperson <br /> McGlone stated he understands the issue but wonders if it is the City's problem. He indicated he <br /> had spoken with someone who had to hire a surveyor to certify his home was correctly <br /> constructed because there was a requirement to get flood insurance. Chairperson McGlone asked <br /> if every builder is doing it wrong and if it is something the City should be doing to guarantee it is <br /> done correctly for the homeowner. <br /> City Engineer Himmer stated it is not required in the Building Code but final grading inspection <br /> is required. <br /> Environmental Coordinator Anderson advised that in today's economic times, lenders are <br /> looking more closely at flood insurance so staff is getting a lot of telephone calls at the time of <br /> closing about flood zone designations. He explained that many times it appears the structure is <br /> outside of the flood zone but the zone crosses a portion of the property. If the City does not have <br /> Public Works Committee / December 13, 2011 <br /> Page4of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.