Laserfiche WebLink
APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> No minutes to approve as it was a work session. Chairperson Elvig asked that staff revamp the <br /> template for the work session agendas as it is not necessary for the formal approvals of the <br /> agenda or minutes, nor is it necessary to call out for citizen input. <br /> 11RA BUSINESS <br /> 5.1. Discuss RTC Master Declaration /Association <br /> Executive Director Nelson noted that HRA Legal Counsel, Tom Bray was present to update the <br /> Commissioners on the status of the RTC Master Declaration/Association. She reported that an <br /> informal meeting had been held and since then, there has been a meeting with Mr. Deal's <br /> attorney. She called on Mr. Bray. <br /> Attorney Bray stated he had met with Ben Halsey, Attorney with the RTC. He stated they <br /> compared notes and found areas where there was agreement with the membership and areas <br /> where there was not. He referenced a map that was displayed for the HRA this evening. He <br /> noted the four parcels identified in blue and stated that in original correspondence, Mr. Deal's <br /> position was that these parcels were not owned by RTC at the time of the Master Declaration. <br /> Mr. Bray stated that he has since asked for Mr. Deal's position with regard to these four parcels <br /> and he has not gotten a response from him yet. Mr. Bray reported that he wanted to check with <br /> staff on a couple of parcels. Two will be developed together but will be developed in a way that <br /> will be entitled to a membership vote — two parcels have the membership vote — two do not. He <br /> explained what qualifies a membership vote. He also described the three categories of <br /> membership. He continued that there are four parcels subject to the Master Declaration. The <br /> drainage pond does not qualify for membership vote. He noted there is also drainage in the <br /> northwest corner. The park is subject to the Master Declaration but not the membership vote. <br /> He talked about the RTC 8 9 and 10 Additions and that neither the HRA nor PSD is in <br /> control of these additions. Mr. Bray was not aware of any active homeowners associations on <br /> these parcels. He stated we have 18 known membership votes which includes six votes on the <br /> parcels he is not sure of. The HRA has nine, PSD has three, and PSD LLC & Anchor's Away <br /> have one, Symphony at Town Center has one, Gable Manor has one, Gable Terrace has one, <br /> Anoka County has one and Allina has one. He referred to the map presented to the HRA and <br /> talked about doing title work on parcels. He noted that the four parcels shown in blue on the <br /> map were all purchased by Jim Deal or another of Mr. Deal's entities; however, the question <br /> remains who owned them at the time of the Master Declaration. Mr. Bray stated he broached <br /> Mr. Halsey with the idea that if there is not a full agreement with the membership voting rights, <br /> does anyone want this association to remain or should it be terminated. Mr. Halsey will discuss <br /> that with Mr. Deal. He added he is not sure Mr. Deal would do anything until he knows what is <br /> going on with the Special Services District. The HRA is not in a position to impose a Special <br /> Services District. Mr. Bray is waiting for feedback from Mr. Halsey. He stated that we have the <br /> complaint drafted to get the declatory judgment — there are significant expenses and there is a lot <br /> of title work to be done. Mr. Bray noted a couple of bids were from $12,000 to $16,000 and <br /> others were at $20.000. he felt there were some things we could do with cheaper alternatives - <br /> Housing and Redevelopment Authority / November 1, 2011 <br /> Page 2 of 9 <br />