Laserfiche WebLink
Poor drainage is one of the primary cause of accelerated roadway deterioration. <br />Staff recommends that we stay with the 9 ton design (6 inches of Class 5 base, 4 inches of bituminous) at the street <br />widths mentioned above and without a sidewalk. Obviously, this is a theoretical street section and will vary from <br />street to street depending on the subgrade or the soil underneath this theoretical section. <br />Charter amendment changes <br />Another topic during the work session was the ability to counter petition road projects pursuant to the City Charter. <br />It does create inefficiencies regarding the work that goes into a project but it preserves the property rights of the <br />resident. Currently 3 5 % of adjacent property owners can initiate a project by signing a petition for the creation of a <br />feasibility study and then a project can be stopped if there is a petition that is signed by more than the amount <br />originally signing for the feasibility or 50% whichever is greater. A suggestion was made to approach the Charter <br />Commission to see if they are willing to require that at least 50% of the property owners sign a petition for <br />initiating a project. <br />Staff is recommending that the Charter Commission consider an action that would require at least 50% of the <br />adjacent property owners to sign a petition for a feasibility study to be prepared but the leave the ability to counter <br />petition percentage to remain the same. <br />Consideration and Schedule for franchise fee implementation <br />Attached to the case is a schedule to implement the franchise fee for the long term road maintenance initiative. As <br />you can see, it would take until July 2012 to start to receive funds for this program.This is an aggressive schedule <br />and takes into account a small window of time for communication with the individual franchises (Centerpoint, <br />Connexus and Anoka Electric, etc.)The timing of this decision is critical in terms of how it ties into the 2012 Street <br />Maintenance project. A case will be presented at the February Public Works Committee as to what Staff is <br />recommending but generally we feel that the 2012 Street Maintenance program should consist of sealcoating only. <br />As you can imagine, if a resident is faced with an overlay assessment and knowledge that there is a plan to <br />eliminate assessments in the coming years, there will likely be a counter petition. <br />In closing, other cities are facing this very difficult decision. Please refer to the attached Star Tribune article that <br />was written about the City of Edina. They have an assessment policy similar to our "do nothing" option which <br />assesses 100% of the costs of their reconstruction projects. In their case it is even more critical since the City of <br />Edina is almost entirely urban density which means the amount of roadway in front of each house is shorter than the <br />mix of property densities within the City of Ramsey. <br />Staff recommends moving forward with the initiation of the Long Term Road Maintenance initiative as <br />recommended above. <br />Recommendation: <br />See Observations for embedded recommendations <br />Funding Source: <br />N/A <br />Council Action: <br />Motion to move forward with the initiation of the Long Term Road Maintenance initiative as indicated above. <br />Attachments <br />franchise fee schedule <br />Edina article in Star Tribune <br />