Laserfiche WebLink
September 24, 2007. Appellant also testified that he received the Ietter. The Ietter states.the <br />property is in violation of Ramsey City Code Chapters 5 and 9 and goes on to state that the <br />nature of the violations were "Any and all conditions constituting a nuisance including, but <br />not limited to, inoperable and/or unlicensed vehicles, construction materials, appliances, <br />junk, rubbish, and debris" as well as "Vehicles parked on »nirn.piroved surfaces." The Ietter <br />also states that: <br />THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIVE MEASURES ARE REQUIRED: <br />Removal of'any and all conditions constituting a nuisance including, but not <br />limited to inoperable and/or • unlicensed vehicles, construction materials, <br />appliances, junk, rubbish and debris. <br />All inoperable vehicles stored outside the property must be stored indoors, <br />repaired and/or licensed to meet City Code, or removed from the property. <br />Operable and licensed vehicles stored outside must be on the driveway or in the <br />side or rear yard on a surface of at Ieast bituminous pavement or concrete <br />(prepared gravel may be used in residential areas Iocated outside the Metropolitan <br />Urban Service Area). One (1) unlicensed vehicle may be stored outdoors on the <br />property, on a prepared surface. <br />5. The September 13, 2007 also advised Appellant that he had fourteen 'days from the date the <br />Ietter was served to correct the violations. It also advised Appellant that he could request a <br />hearing before a hearing examiner within fourteen days of service of the letter by calling the <br />Ramsey Police Department. Appellant was further advised that "Failure to abate the <br />violations or request a hearing within the applicable time period will result in abatement <br />procedures" and that "The cost of the abatement will be billed to the property owner." <br />S. Appellant testified that he attempted to bring the Property into compliance with the City's <br />September 13, 2007 letter notice by removing the vehicles that were inoperable or <br />unlicensed. He also testified that there were six two by fours and plywood sheets he uses <br />when he works on vehicles, ten bricks, and no appliances on the Property. Appellant was <br />3 <br />