Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Committee 5. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 03/20/2012 <br />Submitted For: Tim Himmer By: Tim Himmer, Engineering/Public Works <br />Title: <br />Consider Storm Sewer Improvements on Sodium Street - A Continuation of Discussions Related to 2011 Flooding <br />Concerns <br />Background: <br />Last summer the City experienced several significant rainfall events that lead to many localized flooding concerns, <br />and resident complaints. The large volumes of precipitation that occurred over a short period of time appears to <br />have elevated the groundwater within areas of the City, and prohibited the generous rate of infiltration that typically <br />takes place in the Anoka sandplain. Throughout the summer and fall staff worked hard at registering and <br />responding to the calls, and evaluating the situations on an individual basis to determine whether quick fixes could <br />be implemented (culvert obstructions, re- ditching, etc.) to alleviate the immediate concerns. <br />This item was discussed at the Public Works Committee on August 15, 2011, and at that time staff summarized the <br />areas of concern that were being investigated based upon citizen complaints received. The attached summary was <br />presented at the meeting; which outlines the concern identified, actions steps to evaluate the concern, additional <br />investigations that would be necessary to fully understand the situation, and recommendations for specific projects <br />that could be implemented rather quickly and inexpensively. At that time we classified the issues into 3 categories: <br />1. Those that required no further action. They were evaluated and corrected, or did not need correcting because <br />the water was fully contained within a dedicated drainage & utility easement (functioning as designed). <br />2. Those that required additional investigation and evaluation before deciding on a long term solution, and <br />implementing corrective actions. <br />3. Those that had an identified recommendation for immediate action. <br />At that meeting the Committee briefly discussed the areas of concern, and directed staff to prepare plans and <br />specifications for the items identified in category 3. Once this direction was ratified by the City Council on <br />September 13, 2011, and the plans completed, it was too late in the season to secure bids and complete the <br />improvements in 2011. It was then decided to delay construction until 2012, where some of the improvements <br />could be completed by inclusion in the street maintenance program. Staff is in the process of finalizing plans for <br />these items and intends to solicit quotes for the improvements this spring /summer. Depending on the direction staff <br />receives for potential improvements to alleviate some of the outstanding concerns identified over the next couple of <br />months, additional plans can be incorporated into one plan set for bidding. <br />Notification: <br />The resident has been provided with a copy of the agenda and invited to attend the meeting. <br />Observations: <br />Staff prepared a brief RFP in the fall of 2011, to investigate the areas of concern, and distributed it to members of <br />the City's consultant pool in the fall of 2011. The goal of this project was to have an independent third party <br />evaluate the areas, provide options for corrective actions, and associated estimates to implement the work. <br />Hakanson Anderson was awarded the project to undertake these investigations, and they have since completed their <br />analysis and compiled a report that references potential solutions for each area identified. Attached to this case is <br />the final report. <br />This item was introduced in general terms at the February Public Works Committee meeting, with the direction <br />being that staff would come back before the committee over the next several months to discuss the merits of each <br />potential improvement in more detail. Staff received information this March 13 that Rum River Hills Golf Course <br />submitted information to the League of Minnesota Cities regarding their claim, and that the League will be be <br />issuing a response around March 16. <br />