Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Director Olson stated it was based on the number of current customers with <br />CenterPoint and Connexus. <br />Councilmember Backous noted the franchise fee could be lowered in anticipation of more <br />residents. He agreed with Public Works Director Olson that there may be an onslaught of people <br />wanting their roads maintained if paying the franchise fee. Councilmember Backous asked <br />whether the road maintenance chart can be put on the City's website so residents can see when <br />their street is due for overlay or sealcoat. <br />Public Works Director Olson answered in the affirmative and explained the City sealcoats an <br />average of 13 -15 miles of roadway each year and overlays 1 7 4 miles of roadway. He stated if the <br />Council eliminates the assessment process, it would be much easier because the City would not <br />have to do the mailings except to notify residents of the project and ask if there are drainage <br />problems. <br />Councilmember McGlone asked if there may be a funding deficit with a franchise fee of <br />$14 /month instead of $28 /month. <br />Public Works Director Olson stated a deficit could be created if there is not an assessment <br />because he thinks the demand will be high. <br />Councilmember McGlone stated the Council needs to establish policy on which roads are done <br />first. He stated he would argue there are maintenance savings with 9 -ton roads because the worst <br />pavement failures are at the edge of the road where the water runs and trucks drive. Concrete <br />curb and gutter protects road edges. <br />City Engineer Himmer explained that once funding and the amount it will generate are <br />determined, this software will create a five -year program in how to move forward, providing <br />more certainty to notify residents. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he would support a franchise fee only after asking the Charter Commission <br />for tougher counter petition standards, such as requiring 50% to start a petition, so the City does <br />not waste money on planning and then have the project counter petitioned. <br />The Council discussed that petition results can vary depending on the way the project is <br />presented. It was noted that City Attorney Goodrich had indicated property owners can only <br />petition against the project being assessed so if a sidewalk is included, and not being assessed, it <br />cannot be part of a counter petition. <br />Mayor Ramsey commented that in a "perfect world" the City could get rid of assessments but <br />that may also create a nightmare because all will want a new street tomorrow if not being <br />assessed. <br />Public Works Director Olson asked the Council what level of franchise fee it supports and <br />whether it does or does not support assessments. He noted that as soon as residents know the <br />City Council Work Session / January 24, 2012 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />