My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 02/06/2012 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2012
>
Minutes - Council - 02/06/2012 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 12:18:02 PM
Creation date
3/20/2012 2:51:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
02/06/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL BUSINESS <br />4.1 Discuss Updates to the City's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer and Water Plans <br />City Engineer Himmer presented the staff report. In August 2011, staff met with the City <br />Council in work session to review the City's 2011 development cost study. In November 2011, <br />the topic of comprehensive utility plan updates and corresponding rate studies were discussed by, <br />the Public Works Committee. Council wanted to understand how updates to these plans may <br />impact adoption of the City's annual rates and charges and wanted to wait to deal with adopting <br />the rates and charges for 2012 until these utility plan updates were completed. The rates and <br />charges were adopted in December 2011, with the idea that the utility fees could be revised if <br />necessary once the studies were updated and the results of the rate study completed. In January <br />2012, the Council awarded contracts to Bolton & Menk and Landform to undertake this study, <br />which was last completed in 2004. He noted Greg from Bolton & Menk was present as well. <br />Mr. Himmer explained that the first order of business is to review growth projections,. which is <br />the focus of this case. Without first understanding the assumptions related to how the City <br />intends to grow, updates to these plans are extremely difficult. We would not be able to look <br />into infrastructure needs of the future and associated costs if we have no clear direction on how <br />the Council believes the City will grow. Therefore, staff is looking for direction on what <br />assumptions should be used to calculate fixture growth in the City. He reported that since <br />Ramsey has not realized growth consistent with either the 2030 Comp Plan, which showed an <br />average of 455 units built per year through 2030, or the 2004 Comprehensive Utility Plans which <br />showed an average of 360 units per year through 2020, any revisions to growth projections <br />would affect the amount of service connections — users and ultimately rates and fees. Mr. <br />Himmer stated that another focus is density assumptions. Understanding where more dense <br />growth will happen assists in developing a plan for appropriate sized and located infrastructure. <br />It allows us to implement a program that will fund capital expenditures only where they are <br />needed, and eliminates the potential for unnecessary extensions and/or over sizing. Mr. Himmer <br />reiterated that staff is only seeking direction from Council on where they see City growth in the <br />future for this phase. He noted that during the development and review process for the 2030 <br />Comp Plan Update, concerns were raised by several individuals regarding the forecasts. The <br />forecasts showed that all future growth outlined, which was outlined on a "Future Land Use <br />Map" presented to the Council this evening, could occur by 2030; however, based on current <br />market conditions, it seems unlikely that would be a reality. He noted a few assumptions in the <br />City's existing 2030 Comp Plan deserve discussion. Due to the nature of soils in the City, rural <br />residential development can be supported indefinitely with on -site sewage treatment systems, <br />provided sufficient land is available to accommodate two drain fields. Ultimately, such areas <br />may require public water service. He stated the discussion should be does Council still agree <br />with this assumption. Should there be some investment made for infrastructure expansion <br />to /through these rural areas, or does Council still consider these large lot rural areas as a <br />mainstay in the City. Considerations still need to be factored in for ultimate water distribution <br />into these areas in case groundwater supplies become compromised, or future municipal source <br />wells are restricted. Two keys to future growth — northwest Ramsey will not be allowed to <br />connect to Elk River's public utility systems and metropolitan sewers will not be extended <br />northerly through Ramsey to provide services to the City of Nowthen. He noted that might not <br />be a choice we have — and saying "never" is a pretty firm stance. He inquired if Council wants <br />City Council — Special Meeting — February 6, 2012 <br />Page 2 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.