Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Backous stated to leave the assumption as is in the Water and Sewer <br />Comprehensive Plan and move forward. <br />Councilmember McGlone stated he wanted to talk about this and make a decision. He wanted to <br />do what we could do to change the numbers to bring developer fees down to a frugal responsible <br />level to spur development. He felt that 260 is too much. <br />Councilmember Tossey stated he has been given an answer. Statistically, we are assuming this <br />growth is going to happen — maybe we should be more conservative with our assumptions. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that if we do that we would just raise rates. <br />Councilmember Olson sated that the more people in the project — the less the trunk rate will be. <br />We only write our Comp Plans for 20 years. Therefore, 2040 is done in 2018. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that the question is what our options are for retracting the <br />system and system costs. How much of that cost can we actually pull back on and added that we <br />will not have all these costs if we do not have the growth. <br />Councilmember McGlone stated that when these projections were originally put out there, we <br />were in a rocket ship growth pattern in single family homes. Now it's more likely to be more <br />rental. <br />Deputy City Administrator Nelson agreed it is no doubt the rental market is strong throughout <br />the metro — but to what degree will Ramsey be apartments. She would argue it will be more <br />mixed development. The apartment market for 1,000 units is not the same here as in the core <br />cities. That market will get tested in the next three years but it will not be all we do. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated if we start to project less, it will be less a higher rate — not more <br />rate of return on it. <br />Director of Public Works Olson stated that this plan will be ultimately routed through the <br />Metropolitan Council. If Council wants to say the next 20 years will be zero — the Met Council <br />may hold you to that. <br />Acting Mayor Wise stated he likes the 212 number. <br />Councilmember Backous stated that is why he (Backous) came up with the 260 figure — it's more <br />than the 212 but less than the 450. <br />City Engineer Himmer stated that in 2010 there were 8,000 households. Adding 300 per year <br />over 18 years will take us out to 2030 and a number of 13,400. The Comp Plan says 16,500 for <br />2040 — that's also assuming 300 per year. If we reset the clock today and did the same growth to <br />2040, it will be 300 per year. <br />Councilmember Backous said to look at 260 — or look at 240 — either gets us relatively close. <br />City Council — Special Meeting — February 6, 2012 <br />Page 8 of 11 <br />