My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 02/14/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2012
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 02/14/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 12:19:13 PM
Creation date
3/20/2012 2:52:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
02/14/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Strommen stated she wants to assure the conclusions address the whole and not <br />individual answers since there seems to be some conflict between the points. <br />Councilmember McGlone agreed. <br />Councilmember Backous noted the real intentions will be flushed out during debate but the <br />concern is valid in how much work to do up front to gather information so it can be discussed at <br />a Work Session. He agreed that while the process is not perfect, it is a start. <br />The consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to prepare a work plan for City Council <br />consideration. <br />2) Review 2013 Budget Options <br />Proiections for Refinancine Scenarios on th Municival Center Debt <br />Paul Donna, Northland Securities Finance Consultant, stated the consideration is whether to <br />refund the Series 2005A Bonds issued under the Lease Purchase Statute, to eliminate the existing <br />bond and issue new G.O. Refunding Bonds. He explained this process would gain additional <br />credit quality for the City and take advantage of the current market, resulting in significant <br />savings. Mr. Donna stated he understands the overall objective is not only on savings but to <br />better match the City's budget resources to pay back the debt. He presented the following <br />scenarios: Scenario A , replacing current 4.4% rates with new rates estimated at 2 -2.25% but not <br />extending or shortening the debt. Scenario B , matching resources of the City by targeting a new <br />payment going from $1.475 million/year to $1.1 million/year and extending the debt by five <br />years. It was noted the present value benefit of capturing savings of one -half a million dollars; <br />however, the annual savings may not meet the City's budget objective. Scenario C , bringing <br />payments down in the first five years to $1 million and then leveling off payments. This results <br />in larger savings the first few years and extending the debt by five years. The present value <br />savings would be just over $500,000. Scenario D , resulting in lowering payments from the <br />current $1.475 million/year to $1 million/year and extending the debt by nine years, resulting in <br />a savings of over $100,000. <br />Finance Officer Lund advised that Scenario C was used in the budget analysis. <br />Mayor Ramsey asked whether Scenario C results in paying an additional $800,000. <br />Finance Officer Lund explained Scenario C gets the levy down to about $1 million for the next <br />few years instead of the current $1.5 million, and anticipates additional growth in the future <br />years. <br />Mr. Donna stated the calculation is based on the IRS requirements for refinancing based on a <br />current bond yield of 2.47 %; however, this will change over time as interest fluctuates. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated his understanding the law has changed so the City does not need to hold a <br />referendum. <br />City Council Work Session / February 14, 2012 <br />Page 3 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.