My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/27/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council - 03/27/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:10:51 PM
Creation date
3/27/2012 8:05:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/27/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The City Attorney estimates the time for a district court action to remove the park restrictions is six months to one <br />year, the variable depending on who needs to be given notice of the action, the difficulty of notification, plus how <br />much opposition by interested parties may be brought opposing City action. Interested parties include neighbors <br />who may not want to lose the park amenity. <br />A search for heirs or successors could be a very difficult, lengthy and expensive process for little gain since the City <br />will most likely not end up with title to the property unless the City can convince the determined fee owner or entity <br />in title to convey fee title for the property to the City. The City attorney does not recommend the City undertaking <br />this process unless there is an obvious benefit. The estimated cost to go through this process is from $2,000-$5,000 <br />per parcel. <br />PROCESS/COST OF RETURNING A PROPERTY TO ITS ORIGINAL OWNER (I.E. THE DEVELOPER) : <br />Attorney will review at work session. <br />PROCESS/COST USING LAND FOR WETLAND BANKING: <br />In order to use city owned land for wetland banking, delineation must take place. That is, the City would need to <br />hire a certified consultant to determine the extent of existing wetlands (vegetation, soils, and hydrology) per parcel. <br />After delineation, the City can then entertain the option of banking. Delineation is estimated to cost $1,000-$1,500 <br />per site. Therefore, there should be a significant desire to use a subject property for wetland banking before any <br />further action is taken. <br />Staff is recommending that most of the identified properties not be used for wetland banking for multiple reasons. <br />(1) many parcels are too high in elevation; costs to the City would be significant (2) many parcels are already <br />wetland (3) many parcels are surrounded by developed land and there is no value in banking. NOTE: Properties 06 <br />and 11 are candidates for banking --depending on how the properties are developed. <br />PROCESS FOR THE CITY TO SELL LAND (CONSIDERING IT IS SELLABLE): <br />In order to sell City owned land a "land sale ordinance" must be passed. This requires two meetings. First a public <br />hearing and introduction to the City Council. Second, a meeting to adopt the "land sale ordinance." Following the <br />second meeting is a 30 day grace period in which the public can petition the adopted ordinance. <br />There are a four (4) parcels Staff would like to discuss in more detail with the City Council. Parcels #22 & #34 are <br />potential properties for quiet title action. Parcel # 11 is eligible for sale, but will require right-of-way dedication and <br />platting. Platting of the property could be accomplished by a future developer as part of the development process. <br />Alternatively, the City could choose to plat the developable portion as outlot, reserving the necessary right-of-way, <br />and make available to convey the outlot to a future developer. Finally, Staff would like to discuss the potential sale <br />of a parcel known as Peltzer Park. <br />Recommendation: <br />Based on the attachment, Breakdown of City Owned Lands, there are two recommendations: <br />• Direct staff to begin the process of rezoning and listing all sellable properties (that are not already listed) <br />• Direct staff to begin the process of quiet title action for properties #22 and #34 <br />Staff recommends that the City Council decides whether or not they would like staff to go through the process of <br />returning dedicated parks, and other restricted parcels, to original property owners (there are 20 properties that fit <br />this category). <br />Staff recommends that Council gives direction on how they would like to move forward with property # 11 <br />(specifically regarding the ROW and platting issues). <br />Finally, staff recommends that Council supply staff with direction regarding Peltzer Park (the City has free and clear <br />title). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.