My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 02/28/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2012
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 02/28/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 12:20:16 PM
Creation date
4/17/2012 8:47:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
02/28/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Wise noted it has already been discussed that the City needs to build up a fund <br /> for road projects. He believed it made sense to use those positive funds to start up that fund so <br /> the City would not have to immediately bond. <br /> Councilmember Elvig noted that several years ago, the Council approved a policy to take over <br /> sealcoats but did nothing to raise the budget or cut costs. He indicated the Council needed to be <br /> careful how far it cut the budget, if it wants to fit in roads, and maybe a small franchise fee will <br /> be needed. <br /> Mayor Ramsey stated he would rather take the political hit of less service than having to pay <br /> extra each year. He stated he would not support a combination franchise fee or tax increase. <br /> Councilmember McGlone stated he supported a franchise fee from a sense of frustration that this <br /> is a big issue, yet every prior Council did nothing to fix the problem, which only grows. He <br /> stated he is hoping to fix this problem before he leaves office so the decision is not put off for a <br /> future Council. Councilmember McGlone stated he is always asking how the City spends his tax <br /> dollars and if there is a way to fund roads from the tax base, he would firmly support that option. <br /> He explained that when he was running for office, staff was about 70% of the general fund <br /> budget and with all the cuts to date, staff is still 72% of the general fund budget. Councilmember <br /> McGlone stated the City needs to fix the roads and Mayor Ramsey's plan, in some form, makes <br /> sense to him and it should be considered. <br /> City Administrator Ulrich stated staff will bring this item back to a future Work Session. <br /> 2) Discuss Federal Legislative Consultant Proposals <br /> City Administrator Ulrich asked whether the City Council would like to engage or interview the <br /> two legislative consultant firms or preferred to tag onto the County's efforts. <br /> Mayor Ramsey stated he does not support hiring a consultant. <br /> Councilmember Tossey stated he is not sure these are the right consultants but it would be good <br /> to get federal funds for the overpass project and Highway 10. He stated the City needs <br /> representation but he did not know if tagging onto the County's efforts was sufficient. <br /> Councilmember Backous stated it is probably worth the dollars to have a presence because you <br /> don't know what the opportunities are. He indicated it may be worth investing some money, but <br /> maybe not this much. <br /> Following a brief discussion, Council consensus was reached to interview both firms. <br /> FUTURE TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION <br /> Noted. <br /> City Council Work Session / February 28, 2012 <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.