My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/08/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council - 05/08/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:16:03 PM
Creation date
5/7/2012 12:04:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/08/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rabbits, providing the resident owns the lot and it is not an association — and it is notin the Town <br />Center. <br />Mr. Anderson inquired if we should still leave it as so many units for acre size — and then to <br />allow roosters unless you have 10 acres or more. It appears Council is interested in allowing just <br />chickens and rabbits for smaller lots. fie asked about pigeons. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated he has a little problem with pigeons — he is fine with four rabbits — <br />no pigeons! <br />Planning Manager Miller stated that currently we require enclosures. <br />Mayor Ramsey agreed the animals would have to be contained on the property. Any fence <br />setbacks would be the same as in the Code right now. He added he would like to see a setback <br />for a chickencoop. <br />Councilmember Dehen agreed that the coop should not be right next to the property line. He <br />inquired if someone would be allowed to put up chicken wire. <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson stated that the fence would have to, meet our current fence <br />standards. Chicken coops would have the same setbacks as barns' and stables. We try to default <br />to these setbacks. We could maybe include chicken coops in that area of the Code. <br />Councilmember Elvig suggested with regard to fencing, if it's a solid fence — same setbacks <br />apply — if it's a chain length fence it has to be more inside their lot line. <br />Ms.. Miller asked like five to ten feet to which Councilmember Elvig replied three or four at the <br />least. <br />For clarification, Ms. Miller stated more setbacks for coops but keep fence setbacks the same. <br />She asked again if the Council wants to allow beekeeping. <br />Mr. Anderson stated that several lots in the City have beekeeping — and several cities allow it. <br />e added that honeybees are not typically aggressive. <br />Ms. Miller asked if Council would want to allow beekeeping on a half -acre lot. <br />Councilmember Dehen stated he is fine with a quarter acre lot. <br />Ms. Miller talked about animal waste -and offered that the City of Anoka says on City lots, <br />manure has to be removed at least once a week and they are allowed to compost it. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that any ordinance would have general maintenance items <br />within it. <br />lbs. Miller added that staff could change it for smaller lots. <br />City CouncilWorl ion — May 4, 2010 <br />Page 11 of 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.