Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Committee 5. 5. <br />Meeting Date: 02/21/2012 <br />By: Tim Himmer, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Consider 2012 Street Maintenance Program <br />Background: <br />Staff has been developing the 2012 Street Maintenance Program (SMP) for several weeks, and is seeking direction <br />from the Council on how best to approach maintenance activities for this construction season. In light of recent <br />discussions centered on long term road maintenance in the City, it has been difficult creating a program that would <br />be supported by the Council and community. Until a final decision is made on long term funding to achieve the <br />City's road maintenance goals there are limited funding available to complete all the scheduled improvements. <br />Attached is a map showing all the roadway segments that are due to receive some sort of maintenance treatment for <br />calendar years 2011 and 2012. As you can see there are approximately 74 miles of roadway needing work at an <br />estimated cost of $5,595,400, and the current budgeted amount for the 2012 SMP is $495,000. Further <br />complicating the situation is whether the Council is considering the elimination of assessments for maintenance <br />activities (sealcoats and overlays) and replacing it with another funding option. The current City assessment policy <br />has 2012 sealcoats at a rate of 15% of the total project costs, which are being phased out completely by the end of <br />2013, and overlays at a rate of 50% of the total project costs. If the Council is considering amending this policy it <br />is difficult to develop a program that can be supported by the residents if another option may be available in the <br />near future. The uncertainty of funding long term road maintenance activities, coupled with the City Charter <br />provision that allows counter -petitioning of projects by impacted residents, further intensifies the situation. <br />Staff has come up with a couple of options for the Council to consider in developing the 2012 SMP, and they <br />include: <br />• A typical program, similar to what has historically been done on an annual basis, with a mix of overlays and <br />sealcoats. <br />• A sealcoat only program. <br />Notification: <br />Observations: <br />Another item to consider for implementing the 2012 SMP includes the project schedule, as staff must follow the <br />Minnesota State Statute 429 assessment process, which includes specific timing for legal notices and public <br />hearings. Additionally, staff would like to conduct an open house with impacted residents to explain the project, <br />process, and solicit their feedback on items of concern within the project area that may need to be included in the <br />project scope (drainage fixes, etc.). If we intend to complete the project this summer, and assess the improvements <br />this fall, we will need to hold a public hearing to accept the feasibility study and order the improvements in March. <br />Following the public hearing we are required by City Charter to wait 60 days to initiate the project to determine <br />whether or not any of the individual improvements contained within the feasibility report are going to be <br />counter -petitioned. Following the timeline this would have us preparing plans and specifications in May, bidding <br />the project in June/July, and undertaking the work in July/August. We cannot extend the timeline much beyond the <br />end of August for completion, as there are restrictions for the application of sealcoat materials, and we still need to <br />hold the public hearing to levy the assessments and allow the residents to pay in full for a period of 30 days before <br />Anoka County certifies them to the tax roll in mid -October. <br />If the Council is considering to fund long term road maintenance activities in another way, which includes the <br />elimination of assessments, staff could then forego the required Minnesota 429 public hearing process. This <br />