Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Committee 5.2. <br />Meeting Date: 02/21/2012 <br />By: Tim Himmer, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Discuss Investigations Related to 2011 Flooding Concerns <br />Background: <br />Last summer the City experienced several significant rainfall events that lead to many localized flooding concerns, <br />and resident complaints. The large volumes of precipitation that occurred over a short period of time appears to <br />have elevated the groundwater within areas of the City, and prohibited the generous rate of infiltration that typically <br />takes place in the Anoka sandplain. Throughout the summer and fall staff worked hard at registering and <br />responding to the calls, and evaluating the situations on an individual basis to determine whether quick fixes could <br />be implemented (culvert obstructions, re -ditching, etc.) to alleviate the immediate concerns. <br />This item was discussed at the Public Works Committee on August 15, 2011, and at that time staff summarized the <br />areas of concern that were being investigated based upon citizen complaints received. The attached summary was <br />presented at the meeting; which outlines the concern identified, actions steps to evaluate the concern, additional <br />investigations that would be necessary to fully understand the situation, and recommendations for specific projects <br />that could be implemented rather quickly and inexpensively. At that time we classified the issues into 3 categories: <br />1. Those that required no further action. They were evaluated and corrected, or did not need correcting because <br />the water was fully contained within a dedicated drainage & utility easement (functioning as designed). <br />2. Those that required additional investigation and evaluation before deciding on a long term solution, and <br />implementing corrective actions. <br />3. Those that had an identified recommendation for immediate action. <br />At that meeting the Committee briefly discussed the areas of concern, and directed staff to prepare plans and <br />specifications for the items identified in category 3. Once this direction was ratified by the City Council on <br />September 13, 2011, and the plans completed, it was too late in the season to secure bids and complete the <br />improvements in 2011. It was then decided to delay construction until 2012, where some of the improvements <br />could be completed by inclusion in the street maintenance program. <br />On August 23, 2011 the City Council accepted a petition, from residents in the neighborhood near 149th Lane NW <br />and TH 47, requesting that the City review the drainage problems associated with the wetland complex in that <br />location. The area is largely comprised of the RAMSEY MEADOWS subdivision (5 separate subdivisions), which <br />was built around a large wetland complex and included significant easements encompassing the 100 year flood <br />elevation. The petition was initiated by the resident at 5410 149th Lane NW because they had a considerable <br />amount of standing water in their backyard. Staff conducted a site visit and reviewed plat documents for the <br />property in question, and determined that the backyard of all the homes along the east side of 149th Lane had rather <br />large platted drainage and utility easement at the rear of their properties that corresponded to the 100 year flood <br />elevation of the surrounding water body. <br />At that time staff also reviewed the wetland outfall and downstream receiving bodies (pipes, ponds, culverts, and <br />ditches) to determine whether there was an obstruction that could be holding back the water. While no obstructions <br />were found it was discovered that the outlet pipe from the wetland, that was installed as part of the TH 47 <br />reconstruction project, may have been installed at an incorrect elevation. Staff immediately modified that structure, <br />and was able to provide some relief of surface water levels. It was also determined that the property owner had <br />constructed some improvements in their backyard (retaining wall construction and/or grading revisions) that may <br />have reduced some of the storage capacity in the area and compounded the flooding situation on their parcel. <br />Council direction from that meeting was to analyze the sub -watershed for this area in an effort to determine whether <br />improvements could be made that would correct the concern identified and provide additional relief from long term <br />