My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 05/22/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 05/22/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:16:54 PM
Creation date
5/17/2012 5:59:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
05/22/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Work Session <br />Meeting Date: 05/22/2012 <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />Title: <br />Review Zoning Code Updates Related to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update <br />2.3. <br />Background: <br />Staff has begun the process of completing the final, remaining Zoning Code Updates necessary to implement the <br />2030 Comprehensive Plan, as well as certain other previously discussed amendments. These updates and additions <br />are based on past site plan reviews and comments and /or conditions placed on applications. A major portion of the <br />zoning amendment is the official implementation of the Office Park Zoning District south of Highway 10. In <br />addition, the Zoning Amendments are intended to take feedback from previous reviews and made the zoning <br />ordinance more clear, concise, and easier to navigate and read. Upon completion, it is the intent of staff to develop a <br />series of handouts for each zoning district to list applicable standards and include illustrations to visualize standards <br />in order to further supplement the zoning code. <br />The following has been prepared as a baseline to frame the overall policy discussion. Items contemplated within can <br />be changed, modified, eliminated, or increased based on direction from the Planning Commission and City Council. <br />Staff has attempted to include as many of the ideas suggested as part of the Comprehensive Plan, various <br />subsequent discussions (including the EPB/PC Joint Work Session), and City Council's Strategic Goals for 2012 in <br />developing these discussion points for further review. For purposes of this Work Session discussion, only a few <br />highlights are included that Staff believes need policy direction before preparing the final draft. <br />Notification: <br />No notification required at this time. A Public Hearing will be held at the Planning Commission when reviewed. <br />Observations: <br />The items for discussion as part of this Topic Report can be summarized in the following policy questions to <br />address: <br />1. Consolidating design standards /exterior materials in one location per land use type to avoid duplication <br />2. Expanded design elements <br />3. Moving landscaping requirements related to parking lots to the off - street parking section <br />4. Expanding list of uses in the off - street parking table <br />5. Encouraging limitation of parking spaces and impervious surface <br />6. Consolidating landscaping requirements in one location per land use type <br />Special Requirements and Performance Standards <br />The Planning Commission reviewed a restructuring of the Employment and Business District sections and was <br />favorable to the proposal. The restructured text would relocate all design and special requirements that are <br />consistent across similar districts in one (1) location. This would reduce duplication and make the code easier to <br />navigate and administer. The sub - districts would then focus on the permitted uses. Staff would like City Council <br />feedback on this amendment. <br />The Planning Commission also reviewed the current requirements for exterior materials and discussed expanding <br />this section to provide additional direction, allowable materials, and architectural accenting provisions. This could <br />also include mechanical equipment screening (roof top and ground), trash enclosure screening, and site lighting <br />requirements. This could help provide clarification to developers when preparing a site plan, based on previous <br />feedback on site plan review. Staff would like City Council feedback on whether to stick with existing City Code <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.