Laserfiche WebLink
In the early 2000's, the City expended approximately $2.3 million on land acquisition, public improvements, site <br />improvements and demolition costs to eliminate blighted conditions in this area as part of the development of <br />Gateway North Industrial Park No. 5. In 2003, this same request for processing demolition concrete was considered <br />by the Planning Commission and due to several concerns, including the investment made in redeveloping this area, <br />lack of adequate screening, uncertainty of environmental aspects associated with the demolition materials and the <br />activity not being compatible with development in the industrial park, was recommended for denial. However, <br />within the vicinity of the subject property are two similar uses, both operating with conditional use permits, and both <br />include stockpiling and processing materials. If sufficient conditions are included in the permit, which may also <br />include erosion control measures for the stockpiles and possibly berming along the western property boundary for <br />screening purposes, this general area may be a logical fit for this type of use. The Applicant shall be required to <br />submit a drainage, grading, and erosion control plan addressing both sites to ensure that the regional stormwater <br />system is not negatively impacted by the proposed uses. <br />Given the nature of the use and concerns raised with the previous review for this same use, Staff had asked the <br />Planning Commission if they might want to consider amending the Zoning Code to permit these types of uses as an <br />Interim Use. Many communities use the interim use permit process authorized under Minnesota Statute for <br />permitting these types of uses, as these types of uses may be acceptable in the near term, but may not be so in the <br />long term. This is true for the City's grading, filling, and mining process, which is administered via an interim <br />use permit. Ultimately, the Planning Commission was not interested in considering this as an interim use. They <br />felt that the proposed Conditional Use Permit contained adequate controls and recommended approval of both <br />permits contingent on the applicant developing a drainage and erosion control plan acceptable to the City. <br />Funding Source: <br />The Applicant is responsible for all City costs incurred in administering and enforcing this Permit. <br />Council Action: <br />6651 141st Ave NW <br />Motion to adopt findings of fact relating to the request for a Conditional Use Permit for processing demolition <br />concrete and asphalt in the E-2 Employment District. <br />- and- <br />Motion to adopt Resolution # approving the request for a Conditional Use Permit for processing <br />demolition concrete and asphalt on the property at 6651 141st Ave NW contingent upon review and approval of a <br />drainage and erosion control plan and declaring the terms of the permit, based on findings of fact. <br />- or- <br />Motion to adopt Resolution # denying the request for a Conditional Use Permit for processing demolition <br />concrete and asphalt on the property at 6651 141st Ave NW, based on findings of fact. <br />14191 Ebony St NW <br />Motion to adopt findings of fact relating to the request for a Conditional Use Permit for open and outside storage as <br />the principal use in the E-2 Employment District. <br />- and- <br />Motion to adopt Resolution # approving the request for a Conditional Use Permit for open and outside <br />storage as a principal use on the property at 14191 Ebony St NW contingent upon review and approval of a <br />drainage and erosion control plan and declaring the terms of the permit, based on findings of fact. <br />- or- <br />