My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
06/05/12 Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
06/05/12 Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2025 11:15:23 AM
Creation date
5/31/2012 5:06:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Housing & Redevelopment Authority - Special
Document Date
06/05/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HRA Executive Director Nelson reviewed the staff report. <br />Tom Bray with Briggs & Morgan presented his memorandum dated February 22, 2012, detailing <br />the Debt Subordination Agreement, remedies available to the HRA under the Purchase <br />Agreement, Development Agreement, Loan Agreement, Promissory Notes, Pledge Agreement, <br />Guarantees, and described the Debt Subordination Agreement impacts on those remedies. <br />Commissioner Ramsey stated it sounds like the agreements are the same as the original <br />documents the HRA chose to approve. He asked when are the first $1 million equity call and <br />second $2 million equity call for Flaherty & Collins (F&C). <br />Development Manager Lazan indicated equity calls are at 12 and 18 months. He reviewed the <br />past HRA discussion whether a "carrot" or "stick" approach should be taken and decision <br />reached to incent F&C so the documents have been structured in that way, to incent early <br />prepayment and penalize late payment. <br />Commissioner Ramsey noted that in 12 months the project will not yet be built so there will be <br />no revenue coming in. He indicated if this project defaults, he believed it would be after <br />construction if they can't lease it, and by then it is a moot point. <br />Commissioner Elvig asked Commissioner Ramsey what assumption he is using for the equity <br />calls. <br />Commissioner Ramsey stated the HRA considered whether there should be a penalty if they <br />didn't pay and consensus was reached that an incentive was a better option. If they do prepay <br />the debt owed to the HRA, they would get back a percentage of the amount. <br />Commissioner Elvig stated his understanding there would be a "carrot" and a "stick" if they <br />don't pay on time. He asked whether it is a mandatory pay, noting that is not contained within <br />the documentation <br />Commissioner Ramsey stated he expects them to pay because they agreed to it and if they don't <br />make the mandatory payment, a penalty would be assessed. <br />HRA Executive Director Nelson stated staff believed it was set up to be successful in terms of <br />rent projections and the document addresses the process to use if a troubled situation occurs. <br />Commissioner Ramsey stated how can it fail prior to leasing because there is no money until that <br />point. <br />Chairperson McGlone offered the scenario of a lawsuit by a contractor prior to completion of <br />construction, noting this document will provide guidance through such a situation. <br />Commissioner Elvig stated he did not think the document contained any real remedies and the <br />only remedy offered would put the HRA in a more jeopardized position than if no action was <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / February 28, 2012 <br />Page 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.