Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br />From: <br />Frolik <br />To: <br />Wald <br />Date: <br />11/20/00 4:45PM <br />Subject: <br />Re: Pam Upton <br />Bill called me after you left today. He said go ahead and use the League language about relatives by <br />blood or adoption but he says it will not hold up if challenged in court. I told him that if we are challenged <br />at some point in the future, we can back off. We don't have to go to court over it, necessarily. So in your <br />case you can say that the Planning Commission doesn't want to see this dwelling evolve into a revenue <br />generating rental property because of the rural, single family residential character of the neighborhood, <br />they are recommending that the permit restrict the occupancy of the secondary dwelling to relatives by <br />blood or adoption (you have the language) of the occupants of the principal dwelling. How's that? <br />>>> Wald 11/20/00 03:07PM >>> <br />Pam is okay with waiting until December if we cannot get a complete case ready for the City Council. <br />Obviously she would like to go in November but understands that it is better to go to the CC with a <br />complete case instead of going to the Nov. CC with a higher possibility that it would get sent back to Staff <br />for further research. <br />So I will tell Pam Miller tomorrow that the Upton Case is off of CC agenda if I do not hear from Bill. <br />Thanks, Megan <br />